Understanding Minimal Surfaces: Laplace Pressure of a Capillary Bridge

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter lionelwang
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Surface
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the concept of minimal surfaces, specifically in the context of a liquid bridge resembling a catenoid shape, and the implications for Laplace pressure. Participants explore the relationship between mean curvature, surface tension, and pressure in both theoretical and applied scenarios.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant asserts that a surface is a minimal surface if and only if the mean curvature is zero, questioning how a concave meniscus can exist without Laplace pressure.
  • Another participant points out a potential misunderstanding regarding the geometric differences between a catenoid and a liquid bridge, emphasizing that a catenoid is an unbounded surface and does not enclose a finite volume.
  • A participant mentions that while their liquid bridge resembles a catenoid, they still observe Laplace pressure, which contradicts the initial assertion about catenoids.
  • Concerns are raised about the terminology used, with one participant stating that a surface cannot be both concave and have zero mean curvature, and expressing confusion about the concepts of liquid bridges and meniscuses.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the relationship between minimal surfaces, mean curvature, and Laplace pressure. There is no consensus on the understanding of these concepts, and the discussion remains unresolved.

Contextual Notes

Participants highlight limitations in their understanding of applied mathematics and specific terminology, which may affect the clarity of the discussion. There are also unresolved questions regarding the physical implications of pressure in relation to the geometry of the surfaces discussed.

lionelwang
Messages
23
Reaction score
0
Hi all,

I am thinking that, A surface is a minimal surface if and only if the mean curvature is zero. then, for a liquid bridge with a catenoid shape, there should be no Laplace pressure due to the zero mean curvature.

But it is a capillary bridge with concave meniscus, how can it have no Laplace pressure?

Any smart guy tell me what is wrong with my understanding on this? Thanks a lot!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
the way you asked your question greatly narrows the range of available answerers.
 
mathwonk said:
the way you asked your question greatly narrows the range of available answerers.

Yes, I did not reveal the problem in a perfect way. Thanks for your valuable advice.
 


I know very little of applied math and have no idea what you mean by Laplace pressure, but there may be some confusion in minimal surface. A catenoid is a 2-dim surface, whereas a liquid bridge is a 3-dim solid (if I understand you correctly).

There is a very big difference geometrically in minimizing surface area vs minimizing volume (soap films vs. soap bubbles/clusters).

Just thinking about pressure physically, it doesn't make sense to talk about the pressure inside or outside the catenoid, because a catenoid is an unbounded surface. More explicitly, a catenoid doesn't bound a finite interior, and so pressure doesn't make sense. On the other hand, when I guess at a picture for a water bridge, I think of the catenoid-like solid that my be produced by placing my finger on a water droplet (is this correct?). It is my guess that the relevant physics involved is to minimize surface tension (other forces being negligible), which may or may not minimize surface area (take for example that energy minimization problems in crystals lead to the familiar crystalline shape). I don't see a priori why minimization of surface tension has anything to do with pressure.
 


Thanks for your time on this!
I actually prepared the liquid bridge between two substrates, and its shape is much like the catenoid shape, but I can feel that there is Laplace pressure inside the liquid bridge, For a real catenoid liquid ,there should be no Laplace pressure.
So this bother me a lot.
 


lionelwang said:
I can feel that there is Laplace pressure inside the liquid bridge

what do you mean? did you measure it?
 
So I don't know what half those terms mean, but a surface cannot simultaneously be concave and have mean curvature zero. Catenoids, in particular, are not concave. But perhaps I have misunderstood the question because I don't know about liquid bridges or meniscuses.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
8K
Replies
31
Views
7K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
6K
Replies
5
Views
3K