Understanding Node Spacing in Standing Waves

  • Thread starter Thread starter maccha
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
The equation for the distance between nodes in a standing wave is x=m(λ/2), where m is an integer. As m increases, the distance between non-adjacent nodes also increases, specifically by multiples of λ/2. The confusion arises from the assumption that the spacing between nodes increases with higher harmonics, while it actually remains constant at λ/2 for adjacent nodes. For non-adjacent nodes, the distance is calculated by multiplying the number of segments between them by λ/2. This clarification resolves the misunderstanding about node spacing in standing waves.
maccha
Messages
49
Reaction score
0
My textbook says that the equation for the distance between nodes of a standing wave is:

x=m(\lambda/2)

where m is an integer. What I'm confused about is wouldn't this mean that as m increases and produces the second, third, etc. harmonic, that the spacing between the nodes would become greater? I thought the wavelength got shorter as m increased.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You are not thinking of it correctly. You will agree that the distance between any two adjacent nodes is λ/2. What about non-adjacent nodes? If there is one node between them, the distance will be 2(λ/2); if there are two nodes in-between, the distance will be 3(λ/2) and so on. Do you see now where the m belongs?
 
Oh that makes sense thanks so much!
 
The book claims the answer is that all the magnitudes are the same because "the gravitational force on the penguin is the same". I'm having trouble understanding this. I thought the buoyant force was equal to the weight of the fluid displaced. Weight depends on mass which depends on density. Therefore, due to the differing densities the buoyant force will be different in each case? Is this incorrect?

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
995
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
6K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K