Understanding Nuclear Core: Fuel Rod Composition and Control Rod Function

  • Thread starter Thread starter biferi
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Core Nuclear
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers on the composition and function of fuel rods and control rods in nuclear reactors, specifically focusing on the materials used and their structural characteristics. Participants explore the details of fuel rod construction, the nature of control rod materials, and the implications of these designs in reactor operation.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants assert that fuel rods are 12 feet long tubes made of zirconium alloy filled with uranium oxide pellets.
  • There is uncertainty regarding whether control rods are solid tubes filled with boron pellets or if they are solid tubes made of boron itself.
  • One participant references external sources indicating that control rods are typically solid materials and discusses the use of boron in various forms, including boron carbide and alloys.
  • Another participant elaborates on the construction of control rods, noting that they are made of stainless steel tubes containing solid absorber materials, which may include boron carbide or other compounds.
  • There is mention of the structural design of control rods, including their cruciform shape in boiling water reactors and the implications of cracking a rod on reactor operation and water chemistry.
  • Some participants describe the forms of absorber materials, indicating that metals may be in cylindrical bar form while ceramics like boron carbide are in pellet or slug form.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the specific composition and structure of control rods, with no consensus reached on whether they are filled with pellets or are solid tubes. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the exact nature of control rod materials.

Contextual Notes

Participants mention various materials and designs used in control rods, but there are limitations in the discussion regarding the specifics of each material's properties and the implications for reactor design and safety. Some assumptions about the materials and their forms remain unverified.

biferi
Messages
191
Reaction score
0
I know the Fuel Rods are 12 Feet long Tubes made of Zirconium Alloy.

And they fill them with Uranium Oxide Pellets.

And the Control Rods are inserted inbetween them to slow down the reaction.
And the Control Rods are made of Boron.

But is the Control Rods Tubes filled with Boron Pelletes or are the Control Rods just Solid Tubes made of Boron?
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
It looks like the rods are solid material.
from:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Control_rod

Boron is another common neutron absorber. Due to different cross sections of 10B and 11B, boron containing materials enriched in 10B by isotopic separation are frequently used. The wide absorption spectrum of boron makes it suitable also as a neutron shield. Mechanical properties of boron in its elementary form are unfavourable, therefore alloys or compounds have to be used instead. Common choices are high-boron steel and boron carbide. Boron carbide is used as a control rod material in both pressurized water reactors and boiling water reactors.
 
biferi said:
I know the Fuel Rods are 12 Feet long Tubes made of Zirconium Alloy.

And they fill them with Uranium Oxide Pellets.

And the Control Rods are inserted inbetween them to slow down the reaction.
And the Control Rods are made of Boron.

But is the Control Rods Tubes filled with Boron Pelletes or are the Control Rods just Solid Tubes made of Boron?
Most PWR fuel rods have an active fuel (e.g., ceramic UO2 pellets) of 12 ft. The cladding tubes are slightly longer in order to provide a plenum or open volume to accommodate fission gas released during operation, and to accumulate the He fill gas as the cladding creeps down on the fuel and as the fuel swells during operation.

Some PWRs have longer fuel rods, e.g., 12.5 ft active fuel or 14 ft active fuel. BWR fuel rods may have fuel zones of 12.2 to 12.5 inches, and some BWR fuel assemblies incorporate shorter or part-length fuel rods.

PWR control elements are comprised of stainless steel (304L or 316L) tubes which are suspended from a steel hub and spider. The tubes slide along the guide tubes in the assembly. Each tube is seal-welded with stainless steel endplugs, and the upper endplug shank is then attached to the spider-hub assembly. The absorber material within the tubes is in solid form, which could be pellet of B4C (with the B enriched in B-10), silver-indium-cadmium (AIG), Hf or Hf-alloy, or Dy titanate. Dy titanate has been developed in Russia and is relatively new. AIG is the most common absorber in PWR fuel. Hf was used for a while, but the Hf absorbs hydrogen which comes from the coolant and over time, the Hf swells with the accumulation of H.

BWR control blades have a cruciform structure and actually sit between fuel assemblies rather than within an assembly. The absorber material is either B4C or Hf, or a combination.
 
The control rods are solid tubes with material on the inside. I don't know if it is pellets or what not, I do know that if we crack a rod it will leak all cycle and is pretty messy to deal with from both a water chemistry and reactivity perspective.
 
For metals like silver-indium-cadmium alloy or Hf, the absorber is in the form of a cylindrical bar or rod. It may be hollow. Ceramics such as B4C are in the form of pellets or slugs.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
9K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
7K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 36 ·
2
Replies
36
Views
8K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
5K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
47
Views
4K