Understanding Optics: Why is 2t changed to 2tn in problem 35.54?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Niles
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Optics
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around an optics problem related to the change in wavelength when light transitions from glass to air, specifically addressing why the equation changes from 2t to 2tn in the context of problem 35.54.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster questions the reasoning behind the change in the equation, seeking clarification on the relationship between distance traveled by light and the corresponding wavelengths in different media.
  • Some participants discuss the implications of expressing distances in terms of wavelengths in glass versus air, and the factor of n that relates the two.

Discussion Status

The discussion is active, with participants exploring the conceptual underpinnings of the problem. Some guidance has been offered regarding the relationship between wavelengths in different media, but no consensus has been reached on all aspects of the original poster's question.

Contextual Notes

The problem involves understanding the behavior of light as it travels through different media, specifically addressing the impact of refractive index on wavelength and distance relationships.

Niles
Messages
1,834
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Hi all.

Please take a look at page 4 in this PDF, namely problem 35.54: http://faculty.physics.tamu.edu/hu/221-fl08/YF-ch35-exmpls-new.pdf

My questions is: Why is it that the equation [itex]2t = (m+\frac{1}{2})\pi[/itex] is changed to [itex]2tn = (m+\frac{1}{2})\pi[/itex]?

I know it is because we are in air now, but the light still travels a distance of 2t, and not 2tn? Can you explain this to me?Thank you very much in advance.Niles.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The issue is not the distance, but how many wavelengths it corresponds to. The distance in the glass is 2t, so you'd express that as some multiple of wavelengths in the glass. If instead you want your equation in terms of wavelengths in air, then you need to multiply by n. (Since the wavelength decreases by a factor of n when entering the glass.)
 
I am not entirely sure I understand your post. Am I correct when I say that what you wrote is essentially

[tex] 2t = (m+\frac{1}{2})\lambda_{glass}[/tex]

AND[tex] 2tn = (m+\frac{1}{2})\lambda_{air}[/tex]

and this is because we have [itex]n=\lambda_{air}/\lambda_{glass}[/itex] (approximately)?
 
Last edited:
Exactly.
 
Thanks. I had a hectic day today, and it means a lot that you responded so swiftly.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
24
Views
4K
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
5K
Replies
13
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K