Understanding Orbital Motion: Comparing Satellite Weights in Different Orbits

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around understanding orbital motion, specifically focusing on the acceleration of the moon towards the Earth and comparing the weights of two satellites in different orbits. The subject area includes gravitational forces and circular motion dynamics.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the forces acting on orbiting bodies, question the application of gravitational equations, and discuss the implications of the radius on satellite weight ratios.

Discussion Status

There is an ongoing exploration of gravitational equations and their application to the problem. Some participants provide guidance on modeling the situation and drawing diagrams, while others question the correctness of the equations presented. Multiple interpretations of gravitational force are being discussed.

Contextual Notes

Participants are navigating potential confusion regarding the signs in gravitational equations and the assumptions made about circular orbits. There is a mention of the need to consider the relationships between the radii of the orbits when comparing satellite weights.

rachael
Messages
55
Reaction score
0
q1. what is the acceleration of the moon towards the earth?
q2. Two satellites,X and Y, of equal mass are orbiting the Earth in orbits of radii r and 3r respectively. Find the ratios:
a. weight of satellite X/ weigh of satellite Y

thank you
 
Physics news on Phys.org
a1: I'm assuming you're modeling the orbits as circular motion, either way, try writing the forces acting on the two bodies (earth and the moon), and draw a figure that should help.

a2: similar to q1, except you have to do it twice, one for each satellite. now you'll have two equations and with the relationships of the radii given, you may solve for the masses.
hope this helps, sincerely, x
 
i don't get it
 
It might help you to know that
[tex]F_g= -\frac{GMm}{r^2}[/itex]<br /> where G is the universal gravitational constant, M and m are the masses of the objects and r is the distance between their centers.[/tex]
 
I don't think it is F=-(GMm)/r²
there should'nt be a minus sign there.
You might have confused it with gravitational potential energy? U=-(GMm)/r
 
no, HallsofIvy's equation is correct.
 
my bad, without the minus sign is only a convention haha
 

Similar threads

Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K