MHB Understanding Orthogonality in Inner Product Spaces

AI Thread Summary
In inner product spaces, the condition \( (x,x)=0 \) implies that \( x=0 \). However, if \( (x,y)=0 \), it only indicates that \( x \) and \( y \) are orthogonal, meaning they are perpendicular, or that at least one of them is zero. It does not necessarily mean that both \( x \) and \( y \) must be zero. This distinction is important in understanding the properties of inner product spaces. Overall, orthogonality does not imply that both vectors are null.
mathmari
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
4,984
Reaction score
7
Hey! :o

We know that:
$$(x,x)=0 \Rightarrow x=0$$

When we have $\displaystyle{(x,y)=0}$, do we conclude that $\displaystyle{x=0 \text{ AND } y=0}$. Or is this wrong? (Wondering)
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
mathmari said:
Hey! :o

We know that:
$$(x,x)=0 \Rightarrow x=0$$

When we have $\displaystyle{(x,y)=0}$, do we conclude that $\displaystyle{x=0 \text{ AND } y=0}$. Or is this wrong? (Wondering)

Hi hi! (Happy)

In this case we can only say that $x$ and $y$ are perpendicular, or one of them is zero.
Note that $(\hat \imath, \hat \jmath) = 0$. (Wasntme)
 
I like Serena said:
Hi hi! (Happy)

In this case we can only say that $x$ and $y$ are perpendicular, or one of them is zero.
Note that $(\hat \imath, \hat \jmath) = 0$. (Wasntme)

I see! Thanks a lot! (Sun)
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
636
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
10
Views
1K
Replies
8
Views
3K
Back
Top