Understanding Oxidizing Agents in 2CuO + C

  • Thread starter Thread starter Drakkith
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Oxidizing
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The oxidizing agent in the reaction 2CuO + C = 2Cu + CO2 is CuO. In this reaction, copper (Cu) transitions from an oxidation state of +2 in CuO to 0 in elemental copper, indicating it gains electrons. Carbon (C) is oxidized from an oxidation state of 0 to +4, losing electrons in the process. The confusion arises from the fact that CuO is consumed in the reaction, but its role as the oxidizing agent is defined by the transfer of electrons, not its presence in the products.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of oxidation states and electron transfer in redox reactions
  • Familiarity with the concept of oxidizing and reducing agents
  • Knowledge of basic chemical reaction equations
  • Experience with interpreting chemical equations and balancing reactions
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the principles of redox reactions in detail
  • Learn about oxidation states and how to determine them in various compounds
  • Explore the concept of electron transfer in chemical reactions
  • Investigate other common oxidizing agents and their roles in different reactions
USEFUL FOR

Chemistry students, educators, and anyone interested in understanding redox reactions and the role of oxidizing agents in chemical processes.

Drakkith
Mentor
Messages
23,198
Reaction score
7,678

Homework Statement



Which substance is the oxidizing agent in this reaction? 2CuO + C = 2Cu + CO2

Homework Equations



2CuO + C = 2Cu + CO2

The Attempt at a Solution



According to the online program I'm using for homework, CuO is the oxidizing agent, but I don't understand why. The oxidizing agent is the substance that gained electrons. Cu had an oxidation state of +2 prior to the reaction, and ends up gaining electrons to form neutral Cu. Each oxygen had an oxidation state of -2 prior to the reaction and ends up with -2 after the reaction. Carbon has an oxidation state of zero prior to the reaction and ends up with +4 after the reaction since it is reduced.

So 4 electrons are taken from carbon and given to 2 copper atoms. Shouldn't Cu be the oxidizing agent here? CuO doesn't even exist after the reaction, so how can it have gained electrons?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
All you want to look at is the reactant, no deeper details such as which metal oxide you're using to oxidize C, or the specific mechanism. Sorting "spectators" like K+ from chemistries of aqueous solutions can be arbitrary, and sorting oxidizer, oxidizing agent, can be equally arbitrary, but the reaction as written involves mixing two black solids and getting a bright metal and a gas as products, one reactant was oxidized, and one reactant was reduced. You can also look at it from the point of view that CuO is a way of identifying a specific oxidized copper compound to use in the reaction reducing copper.
 
So you're saying that since CuO is a reactant, you can't separate the Cu out of it and say that Cu was the oxidizing agent?
 
Correct.
 
Thanks Bystander.
 
Anytime. Chemistry can be "arbitrary" at times.
 
Eh. It's the memorization that's killing me.
 
Been there --- enough rote memory will eventually reach a critical mass in which "contexts" will begin to take shape, and you'll be able to start memorizing exceptions to general rules rather than everything that's presented.
 

Similar threads

Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
4K
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
6K
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
7K