Understanding Particle Interactions with Scalar and Vector Fields

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter webb202
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Fields Interaction
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers around the nature of particle interactions with scalar and vector fields, exploring the implications of these interactions for concepts such as force and movement. Participants examine theoretical aspects of these fields, their properties, and potential connections to inertial mass.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant suggests that when a particle interacts with a vector field, it experiences a force that depends on its charge and the local field conditions, while interaction with a scalar field results in a return value without movement.
  • Another participant proposes that a scalar field lacks directional information and is symmetric, implying that it does not influence a particle's direction of motion, unlike a vector field.
  • A different viewpoint introduces the Newtonian gravitational field as a scalar field, noting that its gradient provides the force experienced by particles.
  • Another participant argues that the scalar field is an analytical construct and that particles only experience the vector at a given moment, suggesting that movement is necessary to experience the gradient of the field.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the implications of scalar versus vector fields for particle movement and force. There is no consensus on the nature of these interactions or their consequences.

Contextual Notes

Some assumptions about the nature of scalar and vector fields are not fully explored, and the discussion includes unresolved aspects regarding the relationship between movement and field interactions.

webb202
Messages
12
Reaction score
2
Can anyone help with an ongoing argument we are having. When a particle interacts with a vector field e.g. the electric field, it experiences a force trying to move it which depends on the particle charge and the local field condition, - but when it interacts with a scalar field e.g. the Higs field, it just gets a return value ,- no movement - the contention is that whilst it is interacting with the scalar field it cannot move, movement is only allowed with vector fields. This could be the start of an explanation for inertial mass!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Interesting question. My first guess would be that a scalar field would not have directional information and is symmetric with respect to any direction (including changes in the direction of motion). But a vector field does have directional information. So any interaction with a vector field would change a particles direction.
 
How about the good old Newtonian gravitational field? The field phi is a scalar under Galileitransformations (not under accelerations, but that's no problem), and its gradient gives the force experienced by particles.
 
The field Phi is an analytical construct, particles experience only the vector at a given moment, only by moving do they experience the gradient
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
5K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K