Understanding Photons: The Role of Energy and Momentum in their Existence

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Goodver
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Photons Prediction
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the nature of photons, specifically their energy and momentum characteristics as massless particles. Participants explore the implications of the energy-momentum equation and how it relates to the definitions of momentum for both massless and massive particles.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant notes that the existence of photons as massless particles is derived from the energy-momentum equation, questioning why the mass term can be eliminated while still applying momentum definitions.
  • Another participant clarifies that momentum defined as m*v is only valid at low velocities and does not apply to light, suggesting that the proper definition of momentum for light is p=E/c.
  • A participant expresses confusion regarding the relationship between the relativistic momentum equation and the energy-momentum equation, questioning how p=mv can be derived for low velocities.
  • Another participant explains that p=E/c applies to massless particles and that p=mv is valid for massive particles, suggesting the use of the binomial approximation for derivation.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants exhibit some agreement on the definitions of momentum for massless versus massive particles, but there remains confusion and uncertainty regarding the derivation of relationships between energy and momentum, indicating that the discussion is not fully resolved.

Contextual Notes

There are limitations in the discussion regarding the assumptions made about the applicability of momentum definitions at different velocities and the conditions under which the energy-momentum equation is used. Some mathematical steps and approximations are also not fully resolved.

Goodver
Messages
101
Reaction score
1
i have read that existence of photons as a mass less particles came from the energy momentum equation.

E^2 = (mc^2)^2 + (pc)^2

and that since when m = 0, there is still an energy = pc

but, sunce momentum defined as m*v, and mass is absolute quantity, then why that m = 0 which we were using to eliminatethe first term does not apply for momentum
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Momentum is only equal to m*v in the low velocity limit. It does not work for particles approaching the speed of light, and completely breaks down for light itself. the proper definition of momentum is in the equation you stated, which is valid for all velocities, including light speed.

For light, the momentum is p=E/c.
 
Thank you Matterwave, however I am confused.

if p = E / c

then what is a relarivistic momentum p = m*v / sqrt( 1 - v^2/c^2 ) ?

and how come from energy momentum equation one can derive p=mv for low velocities?

thank you
 
Goodver said:
if p = E / c

This applies only to massless particles like photons

then what is a relarivistic momentum p = m*v / sqrt( 1 - v^2/c^2 ) ?

This applies only to massive particles.

and how come from energy momentum equation one can derive p=mv for low velocities?

p = mv applies only to massive particles, so you can safely derive it from your second equation above. Write it as ##p = mv (1-v^2/c^2)^{-1/2}## and use the binomial approximation: ##(1-x)^n \approx 1-nx## when x << 1.

You can also get it from ##E^2 = (pc)^2 + (mc^2)^2##, but you also need to use an equation that gives you the velocity, namely ##v = pc^2/E## or the way I like to remember it, ##v/c = pc/E##. And you have to use the binomial approximation.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: 1 person
Great, thanks
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
528
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
3K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
2K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
2K
  • · Replies 131 ·
5
Replies
131
Views
12K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 38 ·
2
Replies
38
Views
3K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K