Understanding Probability Amplitude, State Operators and Galilei Group

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on the concepts of probability amplitude and state operators within quantum mechanics, specifically addressing the wavefunction's role as a dimensionless complex number in discrete cases and as a probability amplitude density in continuous cases. The state operator ρ is dimensionless with a trace of one, while observable operators must have eigenvalues with appropriate units. The conversation also explores the Galilei group's generators, emphasizing the significance of units in quantum measurements and the implications of introducing a unit of action, represented by Planck's constant, in theoretical frameworks.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of quantum mechanics principles, particularly wavefunctions and state operators.
  • Familiarity with the Galilei group and its generators in physics.
  • Knowledge of dimensional analysis in the context of quantum measurements.
  • Basic grasp of Planck's constant and its role in quantum theory.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the implications of wavefunction normalization in quantum mechanics.
  • Research the properties and applications of the Galilei group in quantum physics.
  • Explore dimensional analysis techniques in quantum mechanics, focusing on units of measurement.
  • Investigate the path integral formalism and its relation to Planck's constant in quantum theory.
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, quantum mechanics students, and researchers interested in the mathematical foundations of quantum theory and the implications of dimensional analysis in physical measurements.

Delta Kilo
Messages
329
Reaction score
22
Greetings,

Just checking if I'm getting this ... please correct me if I'm wrong.

The value of the wavefunction is 'probability amplitude' in discrete case and 'probability amplitude density' in continuous case. The former is a dimensionless complex number and the latter is the same multiplied by the inverse of the units of coordinare vectors in space on which the distribution is defined. Eg. Ψ(x,t) would have units ##L^{-3}##. The actual scale factor is irrelevant.

State operator ρ is dimensionless with Tr{ρ}=1. However for the operator R representing observable the eigenvalues must have proper units if we want the measurements to come out right. That is,λ in ##R|ψ\rangle=λ|ψ\rangle## has to have the right units. Now what does it mean in terms of domain and range of operator R? I thought it was supposed to be defined over some vector space ##\Omega^\times##, but how can ##| ψ\rangle## and ##(5kg)|ψ\rangle## belong to the same space? I guess these are in fact two different spaces with the same structrure but as you never need to add elements from different spaces and the units always cancel out nicely in the end, the distinction is quietly ignored.

Looking at the generators of Galilei group, the units of P are necesserily ##L^{-1}##, H is ##T^{-1}##, J is 1 and G is ##L^{-1}T## (so we can have eg. ##e^{iPx}##, ##e^{iHt}## etc. But in order to connect them to familiar notions, we introduce this funny coefficient ##\hbar## which has units of action ##J \cdot s##. But I 'm just wondering, is there some deeper meaning whereby measuring energy in ##s^{-1}## and momentum in ##m^{-1}## would actually make sense? Let's say we introduce a unit of action , ##\hbar=1 fubar##.Then we'll be measuring energy in fubars per second and momentum in fubars per meter. Mass will come out as fubar-second/meter² (hmm, not sure about this one). What would the quantity of 1 fubar signify?

Regards, DK
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Planck's constant has units of angular momentum or "action". In old quantum physics, Bohr-Sommerfeld quantization was quantization of action.
 
The best way of looking at Planks constant IMHO is the path integral formalism:
http://hitoshi.berkeley.edu/221a/pathintegral.pdf

The wavefunction is dimensionless so the action in the path integral, which of course has units of action, must be divided by a constant that also has units of action, so its dimensionless. That constant is Planks constant - its required by dimensional analysis, and of course its exact value is an experimental matter - but can, again of course, be set to 1 for theoretical convenience by a simple rescaling of units.

Thanks
Bill
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
4K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
7K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K