Understanding Proportional Controller Offset Error

Click For Summary
A proportional controller inherently results in an offset error because it makes diminishing corrections as it approaches the set point, leading to a stable state that is slightly away from the desired value. The integral term in a PID controller is intended to eliminate this offset by accumulating the error over time and adjusting accordingly. To effectively set the integral term, the system must first be allowed to run to identify the offset. The discussion highlights the need for standardized terminology in PID controller setups to simplify the process. Offset error is defined as the difference between the set point and the stabilized value, such as a temperature controller stabilizing at 98 degrees instead of the target 100 degrees.
mpm166
Messages
14
Reaction score
0
Why is it that a proportional controller will always result in an offset error?
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
Isn't that what the I (integral) term is supposed to compensate for?

Here is the way I see it. A Pure PD (proportional, Differential) controller makes smaller corrections as you approach the set point. When you get inside of a certain band the corrections are essentially zero, so you will have an offset. The integral term is designed to compensate for this offset by summing (integrating) the error over many control cycles. To set the integral term you need to let the process run to determine the offset then set an appropriate integral term. It seems like everyone who does PID controllers use slightly different terminology, it would be a lot easier to set up PID if they could standardize the terminology.
 
What exactly is meant by an offset error?
 
The offset is when a system under PID (Proportional Integral Differential) control stabilizes a small distance from the control set point. So if you were using a temperature PID controller with a set point of 100 deg, the system would stabilize at 98.
 
What mathematics software should engineering students use? Is it correct that much of the engineering industry relies on MATLAB, making it the tool many graduates will encounter in professional settings? How does SageMath compare? It is a free package that supports both numerical and symbolic computation and can be installed on various platforms. Could it become more widely used because it is freely available? I am an academic who has taught engineering mathematics, and taught the...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
7K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
10
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K