Understanding Quantum Theory: A Beginner's Guide to Particle Physics

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around understanding particle physics, particularly in relation to quantum theory and the nature of protons and quarks. Participants seek resources for beginners and explore concepts such as quantum chromodynamics (QCD), the role of gluons, and the implications of Richard Feynman's statements regarding particle interactions.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested
  • Homework-related

Main Points Raised

  • One participant expresses a need for beginner-friendly resources on particle physics, referencing Feynman's comments about quarks and paradoxes.
  • Another participant explains that protons consist of three quarks bound by high-energy gluons, which can create quark-antiquark pairs, complicating the understanding of their structure.
  • A question is raised about whether advancements in knowledge have resolved Feynman's paradoxes, to which another participant responds that Feynman was instrumental in the development of these concepts.
  • Discussion includes the concept of renormalization in quantum field theory, highlighting the challenges of dealing with infinities in calculations.
  • Frank Wilczek's contributions to QCD and his resources are recommended as accessible materials for understanding these topics.
  • Participants discuss the nature of quarks, noting their elusive behavior and the challenges in observing them directly.
  • A question is posed about the differences between the graviton and the Higgs boson, leading to explanations of their respective roles in gravitational and mass interactions.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree on the complexity of particle physics and the need for accessible resources. However, there are competing views regarding the resolution of Feynman's paradoxes and the implications of current understanding in quantum field theory.

Contextual Notes

The discussion reflects varying levels of understanding among participants, with some seeking foundational knowledge while others delve into advanced concepts. There are unresolved aspects regarding the implications of high-energy physics and the nature of particle interactions.

Who May Find This Useful

This discussion may be useful for beginners in physics, educators seeking resources for teaching particle physics, and individuals interested in the foundational concepts of quantum theory and particle interactions.

  • #61
DevilsAvocado said:
Thrilling Update:

It looks like my question in https://www.physicsforums.com/showpost.php?p=2555746&postcount=21" about macroscopic EPR is just on the edge of being realized:


A 60µm resonator isn’t directly a "human observer", but it is definitely macroscopic!

http://www.sciencenews.org/view/download/id/57383/name/Quantum_object.jpg
Amazing!



posted time ago:
Mar18-10
Micron sized object observed in quantum state

https://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=387688




DevilsAvocado said:
Thanks again.
Maybe it’s luck that I don’t work with these things (as it probably would drive me crazy :smile:).

This is so extremely weird... almost as if there are two separate worlds, the macroscopic and the microscopic...

Hasn’t anyone tried to build a 'bridge' between the two, to see what happens? Like extremely large fullerenes, or something else? How about running the EPR paradox with objects on the 'border' to the QM world...

Or is it just impossible...

there is no border, is continous...
the microscopic and the macroscopic
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #62
yoda jedi said:
posted time ago:
Thanks for the info yoda jedi. Well, there seems to be 'some' discussion whether:
https://www.physicsforums.com/showpost.php?p=2630488&postcount=4"

As long as no one has showed me a cat that is simultaneously dead and alive, I regard this as an "open question"...

But macroscopic EPR, if possible, would be thrilling.

"If a Boeing 747 is filled with petite ballet dancers, it doesn’t automatically mean the Boeing 747 also can dance." -- DevilsAvocado
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #63
The fundamental problem is that to get something in a coherent superposition, you have to ensure that it's not doing much of any interacting with anything else. The larger an object is, however, the more likely you'll end up with that coherence destroyed by interactions with surrounding photons (which are always present to some degree at temperatures above absolute zero). So to get a coherent superposition for a macroscopic object, you it to be both very cold and very isolated. And that's for stuff in the micrometer size range.
 
  • #64
Hi Chalnoth, interesting info. I guessed it would imply some 'restrictions' on large macroscopic objects.

(I’ll continue my 'processing' of post #59)

P.S. Is there any such thing as a "decoherent superposition"...? :rolleyes:
 
  • #65
DevilsAvocado said:
P.S. Is there any such thing as a "decoherent superposition"...? :rolleyes:
Well, if it's decohered, then we can only measure one of the decohered components of the superposition.
 
  • #66
Thanks!
 
  • #67
DevilsAvocado said:
Thanks for the info yoda jedi. Well, there seems to be 'some' discussion whether:
https://www.physicsforums.com/showpost.php?p=2630488&postcount=4"

As long as no one has showed me a cat that is simultaneously dead and alive, I regard this as an "open question"...

But macroscopic EPR, if possible, would be thrilling.

"If a Boeing 747 is filled with petite ballet dancers, it doesn’t automatically mean the Boeing 747 also can dance." -- DevilsAvocado

DevilsAvocado said:
I regard this as an "open question"...

of course, soon it will be known...
but the superposition it will last some time...



for a
"to observe the oscillations of a 2.7 kg pendulum mode at a level close to its quantum ground state"
http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2009/07/090716093526.htm

"Observation of a kilogram-scale oscillator near its quantum ground state"
http://iopscience.iop.org/1367-2630/11/7/073032/

..."cool the mirror oscillator to about 1 millionth of a degree above absolute zero"...





i think nonlinearity it will broke the superposition at some level (and/or some time) and NONLINEAR QUANTUM MECHANICS (NLQM) it will supersedes STANDARD QUANTUM MECHANICS (SQM) in the realm of physics..



..."If the nonlinearity idea is correct, this superposition will not last forever".....Singh.



nonlinearity collapses the superposition.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #68
yoda jedi said:
... i think nonlinearity it will broke the superposition at some level (and/or some time) and NONLINEAR QUANTUM MECHANICS (NLQM) it will supersedes STANDARD QUANTUM MECHANICS (SQM) in the realm of physics..

..."If the nonlinearity idea is correct, this superposition will not last forever".....Singh.

nonlinearity collapses the superposition.
Wow! This is interesting!
Tejinder Singh
There is perhaps a more promising experimental test of the nonlinearity. The experiment being planned by the group of Aspelmeyer at Vienna (jointly with Kieth Schwab of Cornell) will attempt to create a superposed quantum state of micromirrors having a billion atoms.

If the nonlinearity idea is correct, this superposition will not last forever. It will have a finite lifetime, which decreases with the increasing number of atoms in the micro mirror. According to the calculations based on my paper

http://arxiv.org/abs/0711.3773
http://arxiv.org/abs/0711.3773"
...
Standard linear quantum mechanics is an approximation to this non-linear theory, valid at energy scales much smaller than the Planck scale. Using ideas based on noncommutative differential geometry, we develop such a reformulation and derive a non-linear Schrödinger equation, which can explain collapse of the wave-function. We also obtain an expression for the lifetime of a quantum superposition.


I shall definitely read this paper (as well as the one by Maximilian Schlosshauer).

This is so amazingly weird... logically one would think that we and the world is built by tiny little 'bricks', behaving 'unreal', and therefore we should also behave 'unreal'. But 'mostly' we don’t...

And at the same time: If we look at very large objects like galaxies they, behave in way that doesn’t work in a scale model on Earth (they rotate too fast to keep the outer stars, but DM 'fixes' the problem).

Maybe, just maybe, there are 'transitions', between different 'scales', that makes the nature work differently at different 'scales', that we are not fully aware of yet...?? 1+1=3...!?

Just a philosophical thought...
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #69
and:


Singh
Quantum Theory, Gravity, and the Standard Model of Particle Physics.
http://arxiv.org/PS_cache/arxiv/pdf/1001/1001.3391v1.pdf

Nonlinear Quantum Mechanics, the Superposition
Principle, and the Quantum Measurement Problem.
http://arxiv.org/PS_cache/arxiv/pdf/0912/0912.2845v2.pdf
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
2K
  • · Replies 31 ·
2
Replies
31
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 36 ·
2
Replies
36
Views
6K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
4K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K