Understanding Rate Laws and Collision Theory

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the concepts of rate laws and collision theory in the context of chemical reactions. Participants are exploring the relationship between reactant concentrations and reaction rates, particularly focusing on elementary steps and the implications of molecularity.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant expresses confusion regarding the textbook explanation of rate laws, particularly why concentrations are multiplied in the rate law for elementary steps.
  • The participant questions the relationship between the number of possible collisions and the predicted rate increase for bimolecular reactions, citing specific examples from the textbook.
  • Another participant suggests that the original poster is neglecting changes to the total number of collisions but does not clarify this point further.
  • A subsequent reply reiterates the confusion, providing a detailed example of collisions in two different vessels and questioning why the rate law does not align with the observed number of collisions.
  • Another participant states that the number of possible collisions depends on the number of reactants, not their types, and references mathematical formulations for calculating collisions.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the relationship between collision numbers and reaction rates, with some questioning the textbook's explanation while others attempt to clarify the mathematical basis for collision counting. The discussion remains unresolved, with no consensus reached on the interpretation of the rate laws.

Contextual Notes

There are unresolved assumptions regarding the definitions of molecularity and the mathematical treatment of collisions, as well as the implications of different types of reactants in collision theory.

drama2
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
hi mate,

very confused by something in my textbook explaining rate law and would be very grateful if someone could clarify it for me. here goes...

text book excerpt:

text book
rate laws for elementary step

elementary step ----------------------- molecularity----------- rate law

...(1) a -> product..... unimolecular....... k[A]

...(2) 2A -> product ...... bimolecular ...... k[A]^2

...(3) A + B -> product...... bimolecular ...... k [A]


why concentrations are multiplied in rate law?


collision theory



collision theory and rate law


textbook tells us: "if particles must collide to react, the laws of probability tell us why rate depends on product of reactant concentrations not sum."

one implication of this is that in the case of bimolecular elementary step reactions (see table above) if concentrations are doubled rate of reaction goes four time faster.

this seems pretty obvious for formula 3 (see above table) and the textbook shows a neat little diagram of how the number of possible collisions quadruples when you double the number particles in a vessel from 2 to 4 SEE DIAGRAM below (by the way ignore the full stops they are the only way i could create distance between the reactant particles the damn post kept condensing the spaces between characters)



VESSEL 1




-----------------------------
A

..... B

------------------------------

VESSEL 2



-----------------------------
A ...... B


A .... B

-----------------------------


clearly in the first instance there is only one possible collision and when u double the concentration of both reactants in the second you can draw four possible collisions between the particles thus explaining why the reaction proceeds four times quicker.


so far so good. the trouble is if you draw this same diagram for forumula (2) i.e.( four B particles in a vessel) in the table above you can draw six possible collisions in the second instance and yet judging by the formula [a]^2 there should only be a quadrupling of the rate. this disparity between n.o of possible collisions with increasing concentration and predicted rate increase gets worse with higher numbers. anyway my question is shouldn't the increase in rate for reaction (2) with increasing concentrations be higher than that for (3) and if it shouldn't why not?


if anyone could clear this up it would be great


thanks a lot

john
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You are neglecting changes to total number of collisions, no idea if it is your fault, or books fault.
 
sorry but i don't understand what you're saying. Would you mind elaborating further. i still can't wrap my head around the following example:

imagine two A particles in a vessel and in another vessel one A and one B particle.

see below
vessel 1
--------------------
A


. . . . . . . . . . A
--------------------

and
vessel 2
--------------------

A . . . . . . . . B


-------------------

clearly in both cases there is only one possible collision. now let's see what happens when you double concentration of reactants:

vessel 1
--------------------
A . . . . . . . . A



A . . . . . . . . A
---------------------

and
vessel 2
----------------------

A . . . . . . . . . B


A . . . . . . . . . B

----------------------

now in vessel one there are 6 possible collisions (6 times as many as were possible before) whilst in contrast in vessel two there are 4 possible collisions ( 4 times as many as before). according to the rate law for elementary steps the reaction rate in both cases should quadruple with a doubling in the concentration of the reactants. the explanation given is due to the quadrupling of the number of possible collisions, but in the case of the first vessel there is SIX times as many possible collisions! by that logic in this particular example the rate in vessel one should be six times faster when the concentration is doubled but the formula is [A]^2 which means it quadruples. what's going on?
 
drama2 said:
now in vessel one there are 6 possible collisions (6 times as many as were possible before) whilst in contrast in vessel two there are 4 possible collisions ( 4 times as many as before).

Number of possible collisions doesn't depend on the types of objects, only on their number. Either n(n-1) or n(n-1)/2 depending on whether AB and BA are the same or not.



 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
9K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
4K
Replies
10
Views
5K
Replies
15
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
23K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K