Understanding Relativistic Kinematics for Proton-Photon Collisions

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on the calculation of energy in the center of mass frame for proton-photon collisions, specifically using the invariant mass formula. The equation presented is E_com = W = √((E_γ + E_p)² - (p_γ + p_p)²), which requires vector notation for momentum. The correction for head-on collisions necessitates the inclusion of a minus sign in the momentum term. This confirms the importance of precise vector representation in relativistic kinematics.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of relativistic kinematics
  • Familiarity with invariant mass calculations
  • Knowledge of energy-momentum relationships
  • Basic concepts of particle physics, specifically proton and photon interactions
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of invariant mass in relativistic collisions
  • Learn about energy-momentum conservation in particle physics
  • Explore advanced topics in relativistic dynamics, such as Lorentz transformations
  • Investigate experimental setups for proton-photon collision studies
USEFUL FOR

Students of physics, researchers in particle physics, and professionals involved in high-energy collision experiments will benefit from this discussion.

jdstokes
Messages
520
Reaction score
1
Hi all,

I would be very grateful if anyone would be willing to check my understanding of this stuff as it has been several years since I used it in undergrad calculations.

If a proton and a photon collide head-on with known energies, then the energy in the center of mass frame will be given by the invariant mass [itex]E_\mathrm{com} = W[/itex]. Thus [itex]E_\mathrm{com} = \sqrt{(E_\gamma+ E_p)^2-(p_\gamma + p_p)^2} = \sqrt{(E_\gamma+ E_p)^2-\left(E_\gamma + \sqrt{E_p^2 - m_p^2}\right)^2}[/itex].

Does this sound reasonable?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
sure why not, remember that you should have vector p's in the first expression:

[tex]E_\mathrm{com} = \sqrt{(E_\gamma+ E_p)^2-(\vec{p}_\gamma + \vec{p}_p)^2}[/tex]

Just for completeness, then use the fact that they are 'head on'
 
That means you need a minus sign in your last term.
 

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
576
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K