Understanding Shankar's Principles of QM: Changing Basis of Operators

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Dead Boss
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Basis Operators Qm
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers on the process of changing the basis of operators as described in Shankar's Principles of Quantum Mechanics. Participants explore the theoretical aspects of basis transformation for operators, including the mathematical representation and implications of such changes.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions how to change the basis of an operator, drawing a parallel to changing the basis of vectors.
  • Another participant explains that changing the basis of an operator involves using a transformation matrix that maps vectors from one basis to another, detailing the mathematical relationships involved.
  • The explanation includes the formulation of the operator in the new basis and emphasizes the importance of understanding the underlying linear algebra concepts.
  • A participant expresses uncertainty about their understanding and considers studying linear algebra before returning to Shankar's text.
  • Recommendations for linear algebra resources are provided, suggesting that foundational knowledge may aid in comprehending the material in Shankar's book.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on the clarity of Shankar's text regarding basis changes for operators, and there is a recognition of the need for additional foundational knowledge in linear algebra.

Contextual Notes

The discussion highlights the complexity of transforming operators between bases and the potential gaps in understanding that may arise from the material presented in Shankar's book.

Who May Find This Useful

Readers interested in quantum mechanics, linear algebra, and the mathematical foundations of operator theory may find this discussion relevant.

Dead Boss
Messages
150
Reaction score
1
Hi,

I'm reading Shankar's Principles of QM and I find it not very clear on how exactly should I change basis of operator. I know how to change basis of a vector so can I treat the columns of operator matrix as vectors and change them? Or is it something else?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It is something a little different. Let [tex]v_1[/tex] denote a vector represented in basis 1. Then to represent this same vector in terms of a different basis, basis 2, we need to find a matrix [tex]T_{1:2}[/tex] that maps any vector representation from basis 1 to basis 2. Thus if we let [tex]v_2[/tex] denote that vector represented in basis 2, then
[tex]v_2 = T_{1:2} \, v_1[/tex].
This means that
[tex]v_1 = T_{1:2}^{-1} \, v_2[/tex]
so the matrix that maps a vector representation from basis 2 to basis one is
[tex]T_{2:1}=T_{1:2}^{-1}[/tex].

Now, if we have a matrix representation of an operator in basis 1, say [tex]A_1[/tex], then it takes a vector represented in basis 1 and maps it to a different vector represented in basis 1. For our example let
[tex]y_1 = A_1 v_1[/tex].
So if we want to represent y in basis 2 we have,
[tex]y_2 = T_{1:2} y_1 = T_{1:2} A_1 v_1 = T_{1:2} A_1 T_{2:1} v_2[/tex].
Hence, if we want to represent the operator in basis 2, the matrix representation must be
[tex]A_2 = T_{1:2} A_1 T_{2:1} = T_{1:2} A_1 T^{-1}_{1:2}[/tex],
and we have
[tex]y_2 = A_2 v_2[/tex]
as required. If you think about what is happening, it should be easy to remember.

Note that most linear algebra books will cover this.

jason
 
Last edited:
Thank you very much. Maybe I should do some linear algebra book first and then return to Shankar. Can you advise some good books about the subject?
 
"Linear algebra done right", by Sheldon Axler.

But you should start with this post about the relationship between linear operators and matrices.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
4K
  • · Replies 43 ·
2
Replies
43
Views
8K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 48 ·
2
Replies
48
Views
7K