Understanding State Space Representation for First-Order Dynamic Systems

Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
5 replies · 3K views
jegues
Messages
1,085
Reaction score
3

Homework Statement



A first-order dynamic system is represented by the differential equation,

[tex]5\frac{dx(t)}{dt} + x(t) = u(t).[/tex]

Find the corresponding transfer function and state space reprsentation.

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



Putting the equation in the Laplace domain yields,

[tex]5sX(s) + X(s) = U(s)[/tex]

[tex]\Rightarrow G(s) = \frac{X(s)}{U(s)} = \frac{1}{1+5s}[/tex]

For the state space equations,

[tex]\frac{dx(t)}{dt} = -0.2x(t) + 0.2u(t)[/tex]

The answer they provide is,

[tex]\frac{dx(t)}{dt} = -0.2x(t) + 0.5u(t), \quad y(t) = 0.4x(t)[/tex]

How did they 0.5u(t) and how did they know that y(t) = 0.4x(t)?

Thanks again!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Bump, can someone please clarify this for me?
 
Hi jeques. I don't know if I can help to clarify your problem. The definition of the first-order system made no mention of y(t), so it's a mystery to me where it came from at the end! Is there something missing from the problem statement that might tie-in with y(t)?
 
gneill said:
Hi jeques. I don't know if I can help to clarify your problem. The definition of the first-order system made no mention of y(t), so it's a mystery to me where it came from at the end! Is there something missing from the problem statement that might tie-in with y(t)?

Here's the question. (see attached)
 

Attachments

  • SSQ.JPG
    SSQ.JPG
    24.7 KB · Views: 614
Hmm. Nope, that doesn't help me :frown: The transfer function bit is clear enough, but I don't "get" the introduction of the y(t) stuff. I'll see if I can find someone who recognizes the problem type.
 
Upon reflection and discussion with another Homework Helper, it occurred to me that the problem would make more sense to me if the variable used in the dynamic system differential equation was y rather than x.

Is it possible that we should take the given system D.E. to represent the form of the equation describing the system rather than an equation of the state variables?