Understanding Statics Analysis for a Simple Square Truss Design

  • Thread starter Thread starter dhume878
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Statics
Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
3 replies · 1K views
dhume878
Messages
6
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement


There isn't really a problem statement. This is for something I am myself designing but I'm struggling conceptually with the basic statics analysis. It's a simple square truss. If I were to write a problem statement it would be "What are the reaction forces at A and B?"

My problem is, I feel like there should be a moment reaction at B. Am I simplifying this too much? Thank you in advance for any help

Homework Equations


2nd law:
∑F=0, ∑M = 0

The Attempt at a Solution


http://i.imgur.com/RtL8b17.jpg[/B]
RtL8b17.jpg
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Please clarify. Is it a rigid weightless square, attached at (not merely sitting upon) supports A and B? And the only applied force is F1?
If so, your equations are OK, but you need to take moments too. What point you take them about is not important - just make it somewhere convenient.
 
The square is not rigid, I think that is the fact that is confusing me.

The points A,B,C,D are not pinned, they are fixed via some kind of joint (to represent a more complex joint). So A - D can fail given some moment or max force, and I want to analyze the system to ensure that those values will not reach the point of failure.
 
dhume878 said:
The square is not rigid, I think that is the fact that is confusing me.

The points A,B,C,D are not pinned, they are fixed via some kind of joint (to represent a more complex joint). So A - D can fail given some moment or max force, and I want to analyze the system to ensure that those values will not reach the point of failure.
I guess you mean the joints do not freely rotate but they can flex in response to load, yes? So there is some stiffness factor, which needs to be known?
What about the rods themselves? Are they to be rigid or flexible to some degree?
If the lower corners are not pinned to their supports, the only force preventing the frame from rotating is its own weight, but you do not show that on the diagram.