Statics, moment of inertia simple square-shape (no calculus)

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around calculating the moment of inertia for a simple square-shaped cross-section, specifically focusing on the central axes Xc and Yc. The original poster provides specific dimensions and expected answers while indicating that calculus is not to be used in the solution.

Discussion Character

  • Mixed

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the accuracy of distance measurements used in the calculations, with some questioning the setup of the rectangles in relation to the axes. There is an emphasis on verifying distances through drawings.

Discussion Status

Some participants have provided feedback on the original poster's approach, suggesting corrections to the distances used in the calculations. The discussion appears to be moving towards clarification of the setup, with indications that the original poster has made adjustments based on the feedback received.

Contextual Notes

There is mention of a specific constraint regarding the use of calculus, which shapes the nature of the problem-solving approach being discussed. Additionally, the original poster acknowledges an error in their initial calculations.

Femme_physics
Gold Member
Messages
2,548
Reaction score
1
Statics, moment of inertia simple square-shape...need help (no calculus)

Homework Statement



Calculate the moment of inertia to the central axes Xc and Yc for the sketched cross-section.

Xc = 33.9 mm
Yc = 150 mm


http://img822.imageshack.us/img822/1303/97823499.jpg

Uploaded with ImageShack.us

Homework Equations



Moment of inertia geometrical shapes. No calculus.

Answers are

Ix = 1.008 x 10^8 mm^4
Iy = 1.085 x 10^7 mm4


The Attempt at a Solution


attached. I accidentally wrote Yc in the last equation instead of Iy...
 

Attachments

  • a1.jpg
    a1.jpg
    34.3 KB · Views: 579
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org


Your horizontal distance of the smaller rectangle has been taken as if it was horizontally centered, but it's not...
 


I've been trying to think what you mean but I'm not sure. Are my distances incorrect?
 


Femme_physics said:
I've been trying to think what you mean but I'm not sure. Are my distances incorrect?

You have your distances as:
(125/2-33.9) for the larger rectangle, but (110/2-33.9) for the smaller rectangle.
The latter is incorrect.

Perhaps if you draw it on paper (accurately enough), you can measure the distances and you'll see what I mean.
Note that it's always useful to make drawings like that if only to verify no mistakes were made.
 


Got it! So the distance should be 125-110/2-33.9 = 36.1.

Yep, right answer now :D Merci me amora!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
20K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
65K
Replies
7
Views
13K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K