Understanding Statics Analysis for a Simple Square Truss Design

  • Thread starter Thread starter dhume878
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Statics
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the statics analysis of a simple square truss design. The original poster is exploring the reaction forces at supports A and B, while grappling with the implications of the truss not being rigid and the nature of the joints involved.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants are questioning the rigidity of the square truss and the nature of the joints at points A, B, C, and D. There is a focus on whether the system can fail under certain loads and moments, and how to appropriately analyze these factors.

Discussion Status

Some participants have provided clarifications regarding the nature of the truss and the forces acting on it. There is an ongoing exploration of the assumptions regarding rigidity and joint behavior, with no explicit consensus reached yet.

Contextual Notes

The original poster indicates that the truss is not rigid and that the joints are fixed but can flex, which raises questions about the analysis of moments and forces. The absence of a clear problem statement and the complexity of the joint behavior are noted as constraints in the discussion.

dhume878
Messages
6
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement


There isn't really a problem statement. This is for something I am myself designing but I'm struggling conceptually with the basic statics analysis. It's a simple square truss. If I were to write a problem statement it would be "What are the reaction forces at A and B?"

My problem is, I feel like there should be a moment reaction at B. Am I simplifying this too much? Thank you in advance for any help

Homework Equations


2nd law:
∑F=0, ∑M = 0

The Attempt at a Solution


http://i.imgur.com/RtL8b17.jpg[/B]
RtL8b17.jpg
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Please clarify. Is it a rigid weightless square, attached at (not merely sitting upon) supports A and B? And the only applied force is F1?
If so, your equations are OK, but you need to take moments too. What point you take them about is not important - just make it somewhere convenient.
 
The square is not rigid, I think that is the fact that is confusing me.

The points A,B,C,D are not pinned, they are fixed via some kind of joint (to represent a more complex joint). So A - D can fail given some moment or max force, and I want to analyze the system to ensure that those values will not reach the point of failure.
 
dhume878 said:
The square is not rigid, I think that is the fact that is confusing me.

The points A,B,C,D are not pinned, they are fixed via some kind of joint (to represent a more complex joint). So A - D can fail given some moment or max force, and I want to analyze the system to ensure that those values will not reach the point of failure.
I guess you mean the joints do not freely rotate but they can flex in response to load, yes? So there is some stiffness factor, which needs to be known?
What about the rods themselves? Are they to be rigid or flexible to some degree?
If the lower corners are not pinned to their supports, the only force preventing the frame from rotating is its own weight, but you do not show that on the diagram.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
6K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
6K
Replies
5
Views
6K
  • · Replies 57 ·
2
Replies
57
Views
6K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
14K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K