Understanding Tension on a Pulley

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a problem involving tension in a pulley system, specifically focusing on the reaction forces at point E, given certain loads and tensions in the ropes. The original poster is trying to understand why certain force components are not included in the solution provided.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the relevance of internal forces in the system, questioning why the force components from the BD part of the rope are not considered in the calculations for the reaction forces at point E. There is a discussion about the nature of forces acting on the system and the implications of internal versus external forces.

Discussion Status

Participants are actively questioning the assumptions made in the provided solution and discussing the implications of internal forces. Some guidance has been offered regarding the nature of equilibrium in subsystems, but there is no explicit consensus on the interpretation of the forces involved.

Contextual Notes

There is an ongoing debate about the relevance of the forces exerted by the BD part of the rope and how they relate to the overall system's equilibrium. The original poster expresses confusion about the implications of these forces on the stability of the system.

TiredCollegeStudent

Homework Statement


Problem image: https://prnt.sc/gvhjso
In this case I have to find the reaction forces at the point E (the Fx, Fy, and the Moment at point E) by using the given data. The 20kN forces at the load AC are concentrated, and are 1.8m far from each other. The tension of the cable is 150kN

Homework Equations


Fx = Fcos( θ w/ respect to x-axis) or;
= Fsin( θ w/ respect to y-axis)
Fy = Fsin( θ w/ respect to x-axis) or;
= Fcos( θ w/ respect to y-axis)
Moment = Fd (where d is the perpendicular distance between the point of moment and the force)

The Attempt at a Solution


This problem has the solution already given, which is this:
https://prnt.sc/gv93sy

Now my problem is I do not understand why the solution did not include the force components at the BD part of the rope, only factoring the force components of the DF part of the rope/string. Why is it not included in solving the missing reaction forces at point E?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Arnav jamale
Physics news on Phys.org
According to the FBD in the solution, the system consists of the vertical and horizontal booms plus the rope. The BD part of the rope is part of this system and the system cannot exert a force on itself. Only the parts of the world that are external to the system can exert a force or torque on it. These are Earth (gravity acts "at a distance") and the ground at points E and F.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: TiredCollegeStudent
kuruman said:
According to the FBD in the solution, the system consists of the vertical and horizontal booms plus the rope. The BD part of the rope is part of this system and the system cannot exert a force on itself. Only the parts of the world that are external to the system can exert a force or torque on it. These are Earth (gravity acts "at a distance") and the ground at points E and F.

So you mean to say that the BD part of the rope still exerts a force on its own but that force is not relevant to the whole system? I find it hard to accept because should the force exerted by the BD part of the rope become too low, won't the boom AC fall down, assuming its weight is too heavy for the support at point C to handle alone?
 
TiredCollegeStudent said:
So you mean to say that the BD part of the rope still exerts a force on its own but that force is not relevant to the whole system? I find it hard to accept because should the force exerted by the BD part of the rope become too low, won't the boom AC fall down, assuming its weight is too heavy for the support at point C to handle alone?
As kuruman wrote, the system being considered is the frame plus the cable. Internal forces are irrelevant because they always consist of equal and opposite pairs acting on that system.
E.g. we could choose to consider the cable BD as a separate system. The tension in BD results in a force on the rest of the frame+cable system at B and an equal and opposite force on that subsystem at D, and these are in the same line, so no net force and no net moment.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: TiredCollegeStudent
So it's like this: There is a tension from point B and there is also a tension from point D and they both cancel each other out? So this subsystem is also considered an equilibrium system on its own? Is this assumption right?
 
TiredCollegeStudent said:
There is a tension from point B and there is also a tension from point D and they both cancel each other out?
Yes.
TiredCollegeStudent said:
So this subsystem is also considered an equilibrium system on its own?
It can be. You are free to subdivide or combine into whatever systems you wish. If all is static then each must be in equilibrium in its own right.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: TiredCollegeStudent
Alright, thanks for answering, kuruman and haruspex :D
 

Similar threads

Replies
19
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
12
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
2K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
4K
Replies
2
Views
2K