Understanding the Definition of Average Power in Sinusoidal Functions

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the definition of average power in sinusoidal functions, specifically the power function $p(t) = \frac{1}{2}(1+\cos(2x))$. It is established that averaging over one period $T$ provides a long-time average, while averaging over a non-integral multiple of the period can yield different results. The consensus is that using one complete cycle simplifies calculations and is the most logical approach, as averaging over arbitrary intervals can lead to inconsistent outcomes. The average power calculated over a single period is a reliable approximation of the true mean power for sinusoidal functions.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of sinusoidal functions and their properties
  • Familiarity with the concept of average power in electrical engineering
  • Knowledge of integration techniques for periodic functions
  • Basic grasp of power calculations in AC circuits
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of average power for sinusoidal functions
  • Explore the implications of varying integration intervals on average power calculations
  • Learn about the relationship between instantaneous power and average power in AC circuits
  • Investigate the use of Fourier series in analyzing periodic power functions
USEFUL FOR

Electrical engineers, physics students, and anyone interested in the analysis of sinusoidal power functions and their applications in AC circuit design.

jakey
Messages
51
Reaction score
0
I am slightly confused by the definition of average power if the power function $p(t)$ is sinusoidal. Why is it that only one period is considered?

I mean I know that it simplifies calculations but if we assume that the period of $p(t)$ is $T$ and I compute the average power over $[0,\sqrt{2}T]$, I do not get the same result had I computed the average power over $[0,T].$

Case in point: If $p(t)=\frac{1}{2}(1+\cos(2x))$ then the average power is not the same for both cases mentioned...
 
Physics news on Phys.org
If you want to know the instantaneous power then you would use VI. For a mean power value, you could choose any period you liked, to integrate over, but you would need to state that period (absolute phase intervals). It seem perfectly reasonable to me to choose a single cycle (or any integral number) because it's the most likely thing that anyone else would do. Any other period would be arbitrary and could introduce a massive range of possible outcomes (as you seem to be finding).
 
so are you saying that this is simply a definition? I'm sorry but I still can't seem to understand it...so the average power based on this definition, then, is merely an approximation of the "real mean"?
 
Think how you'd tackle a 1kW electric heater. If you took the first 10ms of one cycle, the average power would be somewhat less. Would that make sense?
 
jakey said:
so are you saying that this is simply a definition? I'm sorry but I still can't seem to understand it...so the average power based on this definition, then, is merely an approximation of the "real mean"?

The "real" mean depends on how long you are averaging over the power. Averaging over one period gives the long-time average. If you were given a power function and asked the average power over a certain period of time, then you would average over just that time. If the period (of the power function) is short, you are probably interested in the average over many periods rather than one small random interval. The average over one period approximates this quite well.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
991
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
669
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
4K
Replies
9
Views
1K