I Understanding the diagonal elements of the transition dipole moment

Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on interpreting the diagonal elements of the transition dipole moment matrix for a superconducting qubit. The presence of large non-zero diagonal elements suggests a probability of no transition occurring between the states, which contrasts with the expectation that off-diagonal elements indicate allowed transitions. One interpretation proposed is that these diagonal values may imply the system can be polarized. The conversation emphasizes the significance of diagonal elements in understanding the behavior of quantum systems. Clarification on this topic is sought to enhance understanding of the transition dynamics.
approx12
Messages
11
Reaction score
6
TL;DR
How am I supposed to interpret the diagonal elements of the transition dipole matrix. We learned that the matrix elements ##\neq 0## tells us that a certain transition is possible but what if that matrix element is on the diagonal of my matrix. A transition from ##|2\rangle## to ##|2\rangle## for example doesn't make much sense to me.
Hey guys, I just numerically calculated the matrix elements for a superconducting qubit and I'm having some trouble to interpret the result.
I will include a plot of the matrix I got below:

Unbenannt.JPG

I basically have "large" non zero elements on the main diagonal of this matrix. In previous courses I was told that for example the matrix element ##\langle 2|d|3\rangle## would indicate me that transitions for this quantum system from ##2## to ##3## and vice versa are allowed. Therefore I have a little bit of a hard time understanding the non zero values on the main diagonal.

One interpretation I have is that the system can therefore be polarized but I'm not quite sure about that.

Would be really awesome if someone could share his opinion on this, thank you!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The transition matrix can always have non-zero diagonal elements. There is some probability that no transition occurs, and that's reflected by the diagonal elements.
 
For the quantum state ##|l,m\rangle= |2,0\rangle## the z-component of angular momentum is zero and ##|L^2|=6 \hbar^2##. According to uncertainty it is impossible to determine the values of ##L_x, L_y, L_z## simultaneously. However, we know that ##L_x## and ## L_y##, like ##L_z##, get the values ##(-2,-1,0,1,2) \hbar##. In other words, for the state ##|2,0\rangle## we have ##\vec{L}=(L_x, L_y,0)## with ##L_x## and ## L_y## one of the values ##(-2,-1,0,1,2) \hbar##. But none of these...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
1K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
4K
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K