Understanding the E-Field Between Parallel Plates

Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on the electric field (E-field) between two parallel conducting plates with charge density sigma. When a second plate is introduced, the charge density on the interior sides of the plates effectively doubles to 2 * sigma, leading to an E-field of 2 * sigma / epsilon between the plates. The confusion arises from whether to consider the contributions from both plates, but it is clarified that the E-field is derived from the combined effects of the charges on both plates, resulting in the stated value. Outside the plates, the E-fields cancel each other, resulting in zero E-field due to the symmetry of the charge distribution. The conversation emphasizes understanding the distinction between the plates and the planes of charge they represent.
wumple
Messages
57
Reaction score
0
I'm not sure if this qualifies as a 'homework question'. There is no specific problem...I have a question about something in the text. I posted in 'Classical physics' with no luck. Maybe someone can help me here?

It gives the situation of a conducting plate with charge density sigma 1 on each side. The E field on each side due to the conducting plate is = sigma 1/epsilon.

When a second conducting plate (plate 2) is brought near, the charge on the opposite sides of each of the plates is attracted to the interior side. So now one side of each plate has charge density 0 and one side has charge density 2 * sigma 1 (or sigma 2).

Then it says that the E field between the plates is equal to 2 *sigma 1/ epsilon or twice what it was before the second plate was brought over.

But why wouldn't the second plate generate a field with equal magnitude, making the total E field in between the plates = 4 * sigma 1 / epsilon? Why is the total E field in between the two plates only calculated from one plate, and not considering both?



Then this website: http://www.ac.wwu.edu/~vawter/Physic...ParallCap.html

Says that the E fields are equal to (sigma 1)/2 epsilon and that the E fields add. So the book says that the charge densities double but the E fields don't add, and this website says that the charge densities stay the same but the E fields add.

Also, the E field is 0 on the outside of the plates. The website says it is because the E fields cancel. The book says it is because there is no excess charge on the outside of the plates since it all went to the inside. but why the E field be zero just because there is no charge near it? There's still charge on the inside of the plate, just a little farther away.

What's really going on? I'm confused! Help!
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
The field between the parallel plates is the sum of the fields arising from the charges on both plates. You get it by applying Coulomb's law for point charges arranged uniformly along a plane of infinite extension and integrating for the whole plane and then adding the contributions of both plates.

Note the distinction between "plate" which has two sides and the plane of charges that contains all the charges on the plate.

For one plane with sigma positive charge density, the integration results in an electric field of sigma/(2epsilon) on both sides of the plane, with direction pointing away from the plane. It is the same, only pointing towards the plane for the other plane with negative charge. Inside the plates this results of E=sigma/epsilon. Outside the plates, the electric fields are opposite, so their resultant is zero.

In case of a metal plate, sigma surface charge density means 2sigma charge density in the plane of the plate, as there are charges on both sides. So the electric field of those parallel plates is 2sigma/epsilon between the plates.

You would get the same result by applying Gauss' law for the resultant electric field.


ehild
 
ehild said:
The field between the parallel plates is the sum of the fields arising from the charges on both plates. You get it by applying Coulomb's law for point charges arranged uniformly along a plane of infinite extension and integrating for the whole plane and then adding the contributions of both plates.

Note the distinction between "plate" which has two sides and the plane of charges that contains all the charges on the plate.

For one plane with sigma positive charge density, the integration results in an electric field of sigma/(2epsilon) on both sides of the plane, with direction pointing away from the plane. It is the same, only pointing towards the plane for the other plane with negative charge. Inside the plates this results of E=sigma/epsilon. Outside the plates, the electric fields are opposite, so their resultant is zero.

In case of a metal plate, sigma surface charge density means 2sigma charge density in the plane of the plate, as there are charges on both sides. So the electric field of those parallel plates is 2sigma/epsilon between the plates.

You would get the same result by applying Gauss' law for the resultant electric field.


ehild

So you're treating the two metal plates as four planes of charge, each with surface charge density of sigma? If so that makes sense to me, I just want to clarify.
 
wumple said:
So you're treating the two metal plates as four planes of charge, each with surface charge density of sigma? If so that makes sense to me, I just want to clarify.


Yes, you can take one plate as two planes apart at zero distance or one plane with twice the surface charge of the metal sheet.

ehild
 
Thanks!
 
The book claims the answer is that all the magnitudes are the same because "the gravitational force on the penguin is the same". I'm having trouble understanding this. I thought the buoyant force was equal to the weight of the fluid displaced. Weight depends on mass which depends on density. Therefore, due to the differing densities the buoyant force will be different in each case? Is this incorrect?

Similar threads

  • · Replies 31 ·
2
Replies
31
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
3K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
3K
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
4K
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 58 ·
2
Replies
58
Views
5K
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K