Understanding the Energy Conservation Principle in Roller Coaster Physics

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the energy conservation principle as it applies to roller coaster physics, specifically focusing on calculating energy requirements and understanding the conversion between potential and kinetic energy in the context of a roller coaster's motion.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the calculation of total energy required to raise a roller coaster train to the top of a hill, considering potential energy and the effects of friction. Questions arise regarding the assumptions made about energy loss due to friction and the necessary parameters for calculations.

Discussion Status

Some participants have provided insights into the relationship between potential and kinetic energy, while others express confusion about how to account for friction without specific constants. There is a recognition of the need for reasonable estimates in calculations, and the discussion is ongoing with various interpretations being explored.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the importance of specific parameters such as the slope of the track and the coefficient of friction, which are relevant to the calculations but may not be fully defined in the problem statement.

coldcell
Messages
9
Reaction score
0
I'm not sure if this question belongs to this forum or advanced phsyics.. but since I'm still in high school, I think this is the right forum.

I'm doing physics questions based on roller coaster and am just a little bit confused on how to answer some questions.

You know :

Mass of each empty car and with passangers
Total length of track
Slope of lift
Horizontal distance from bottom of lift to top
Change in elevation at first drop
Track length at the first drop
Length of each car

Questions 1: Calculate the total energy required to raise the train to the top of the first hill

I'm thinking Eg - Ek will give you the answer, but I'm not sure.

A friend suggested that the energy required is simply 0 since the train is moving at constant velocity to the top of the hill.

Question 2: Apply the law of conservation of energy to determine the speed of the first car at the bottom of the first hill, assuming some energy is lost in overcoming friction (use a reasonable estimate)

I'm just dead confused about this one.

Any help is appreciated!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
To raise the coaster cars to a height h (using a chain drive perhaps) you need to do work against gravity. This energy is stored as potential energy at the top. Now when you come back down this energy is converted into kinetic energy. Thus there is constant shuttling of two different forms of energy. Now due to friction some energy is lost constantly (this is why the first dip of normal coasters is the tallest) and eventually the cars come to a stop.
Can you do your question now ?
 
Hm... let me see if I get this right:

Total energy to bring the train to the top = mgh

That's it right?

As for the second question, I'm still confused. I realize that the friction is causing energy loss.. but how do calculate the friction when you don't know the friction constant?
 
coldcell said:
Hm... let me see if I get this right:

Total energy to bring the train to the top = mgh

That's it right?
Yeah that's right.
coldcell said:
As for the second question, I'm still confused. I realize that the friction is causing energy loss.. but how do calculate the friction when you don't know the friction constant?
The question says, "use a resonable estimate", I would assume this means you can choose a co efficent. I believe the coefficenet of kinetic friction for steel on steel is around 0.6.
 
Last edited:
Even if you have an approximate coefficient of kinetic friction, you would still need to know the slope of the track and not just the height .
 
arunbg said:
Even if you have an approximate coefficient of kinetic friction, you would still need to know the slope of the track and not just the height .
I think that information is given in the question;
coldcell said:
You know :

Mass of each empty car and with passangers
Total length of track
Slope of lift
Horizontal distance from bottom of lift to top
Change in elevation at first drop
Track length at the first drop

Length of each car
 
Aww, shucks didn't notice that , sorry.
 
arunbg said:
Aww, shucks didn't notice that , sorry.
No problem, we all make silly mistake, including typos (RE projectile motion thread)...:wink:
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
6K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
5K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
Replies
2
Views
2K