Understanding the Equation: x(t)=2t+2 and Its Inverse Function x(-t)=-2t+2

  • Thread starter Thread starter dervast
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the function x(t) = 2t + 2, specifically examining its behavior and inverse when considering the transformation x(-t). Participants are exploring the implications of the defined intervals for t and how they affect the inverse function.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants are questioning the correctness of the expressions for x(-t) based on the intervals provided. There is an exploration of how to manipulate inequalities when multiplying by negative numbers, and whether the transformations maintain the integrity of the original function's definition.

Discussion Status

Some participants are providing guidance on how to handle inequalities, while others express uncertainty about the implications of these transformations. The conversation is ongoing, with multiple interpretations being considered regarding the function and its inverse.

Contextual Notes

There is a noted confusion about the rules for manipulating inequalities, particularly when multiplying by negative numbers. The original poster's function is constrained to a specific interval, which is central to the discussion.

dervast
Messages
132
Reaction score
1
Hi Let's assume that my function is the following
x(t)=2t+2 -1<=t<0

Which of the following is correct?
x(-t)=-2t+2 -1>=t>0 or
x(-t)=-2t+2 -1>=-t>0 ]
and why
 
Physics news on Phys.org
dervast said:
Hi Let's assume that my function is the following
x(t)=2t+2 -1<=t<0

Which of the following is correct?
x(-t)=-2t+2 -1>=t>0 or
x(-t)=-2t+2 -1>=-t>0 ]
and why
A small hint:
If you let [tex]\alpha = -t[/tex], then [tex]x( \alpha ) = 2 \alpha - 1[/tex], right? Now what value should [tex]\alpha[/tex] take? Or in other words, what's the range for [tex]\alpha[/tex]? How about -t?
Can you go from here? :)
-----------------
By the way, this should be posted in Precalculus Mathematics board.
 
No i am not sure if i can make i :(
I don't know when we have for example the -1<t<2 if i mytliply -1 what changes I should apply to the symbols < >
 
dervast said:
No i am not sure if i can make i :(
I don't know when we have for example the -1<t<2 if i mytliply -1 what changes I should apply to the symbols < >
Just change < to >, and vice versa, i.e > to <.
For example, if 1 < t < 2, then -1 > t > -2.
If -1 <= t <= 2, then 1 >= t >= -2.
If you multiply both sides of an inequality by a negative number, then the signs will change. For example: t > 5 <=> -2t < -10.
However, if you multiply both sides of an inequality by a positive number, the signs do not change.
For example: x >= 2 <=> 10x >= 20.
----------
Now, just answer my question, what's the range for [tex]\alpha[/tex]? And since [tex]\alpha = -t[/tex], what's the range for -t?
Is the second statement correct? From there, is the first statement correct?
Can you go from here? :)
 
VietDao29 said:
If you multiply both sides of an inequality by a negative number, then the signs will change. For example: t > 5 <=> -2t < -10.

I just figured I'd post this little note from my lesson page since the thread creator seemed to be confused as to when to flip the inequality sign.:smile:

[Copied and pasted here word for word:wink: ]

If you must multiply or divide both sides of an inequality by a negative value, the inequality must reverse direction.
 
"If -1 <= t <= 2, then 1 >= t >= -2.
If you multiply both sides of an inequality by a negative number, then the signs will change. For example: t > 5 <=> -2t < -10."

Thx a lot but why in first case whenu u multiply by -1 the t stays sanme?
For me the correct is
If -1 <= t <= 2, then 1 >=- t >= -2.

Finally i agree with that
For example: t > 5 <=> -2t < -10."
 
dervast said:
Thx a lot but why in first case whenu u multiply by -1 the t stays sanme?
For me the correct is
If -1 <= t <= 2, then 1 >=- t >= -2.
Yeah, sorry, that's a typo. :blushing:
So, can you solve the problem now? :)
 
Of course thanks a lot
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
49
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K