Understanding the Force on Current-Carrying Wires in Magnetic Fields

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

This discussion centers on the interaction between current-carrying wires and magnetic fields, specifically addressing the absence of magnetic poles in wires compared to solenoids. The force experienced by a wire in a magnetic field is explained through the equation F = BIΔl sinθ, highlighting that magnetic fields arise from moving charges rather than distinct poles. The conversation emphasizes the need for a deeper understanding of electromagnetism, particularly the interaction of electric charges in magnetic fields, and suggests that the Year 12 curriculum may not cover these concepts comprehensively.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of basic electromagnetism principles
  • Familiarity with the equation F = BIΔl sinθ
  • Knowledge of electric charge and magnetic field interactions
  • Basic grasp of the standard model of particle physics
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the Lorentz force law: F = q(E + v × B)
  • Explore the relationship between electric and magnetic fields in the context of relativity
  • Read about intrinsic magnetic dipole moments and their role in magnetism
  • Investigate advanced electromagnetism textbooks for deeper insights
USEFUL FOR

Students studying physics, educators seeking to clarify electromagnetism concepts, and anyone interested in the fundamental principles of electricity and magnetism.

2kwl
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Hi, I am a year 12 student and I have some some questions about magnetic fields.

Homework Statement



Do all magnetic fields (in particular ones produced by electromagnets) have distinct poles?

How does a force act an object carrying current under presence of a magnetic field.

Homework Equations



##F=BIΔlsinθ##

(force on a current carrying conductor in a magnetic field)

The Attempt at a Solution



I was talking to a physics teacher today, and I asked in the case of a wire carrying current, does it have poles like a solenoid? My teacher said the solenoid acts like a bar magnet and the magnetic field lines touch the conductor, giving it north and south poles on the ends. In the case of a wire, the magnetic field lines are circular around it, and as the magnetic field lines never touch the wire, no poles are produced.

I was then thinking, if the wire has no poles, why then is a force experienced on the wire when placed under presence of a magnetic field? Aren't all magnetic field forces caused by north and south poles interacting? In a way similar to how electric fields are affected by positive and negative charges?

I would appreciate a push in the right direction, I feel like our physics doesn't go very much in depth. Thank you in advance.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Welcome to PF;
I was then thinking, if the wire has no poles, why then is a force experienced on the wire when placed under presence of a magnetic field? Aren't all magnetic field forces caused by north and south poles interacting? In a way similar to how electric fields are affected by positive and negative charges?

It is magnets that have poles, not the fields.
Magnetic fields are caused by the movement of charges - electricity and magnetism are aspects of the same phenomena.

The magnetic poles are an effect caused by fields of a particular shape.

What you are noticing is that the y12 curriculum is not giving you a complete picture of magnetism.
 
Magnetic monopoles are not known to exist.

Even in a bar magnet/solenoid, there are no monopoles. Your teacher is oversimplifying things. If you pick any good physics textbook then the derivation for magnetic field due to a bar magnet is done by considering it to be similar to a solenoid and integrating the field due to rings of vanishing thickness. The books which derive expressions by considering magnetic dipoles are making unwarranted assumptions.

Searching for north/south poles in a wire will not get you anywhere. If you want to know more buy a book which teaches physics at physics at college level.
 
Thank you for the replies, much appreciated. May I just ask what causes the force, on a wire carrying current under the presence of a magnetic field? Is it to do with the magnetic field from the current carrying wire, interacting with the magnetic field of the other magnet? If that is the case I find it hard to understand as most things attract/repel along a straight line, wheras I believe the force on a current carrying wire acts perpendicular to the magnetic field.

I would be happy to be linked any reading material if available, Thanks.
 
The deflection of a current-carrying wire in the presence of a permanent magnet, or another current, can be understood at your level in terms of an interaction between magnetic fields.

That is not the whole picture.

In the standard model, it is understood in terms of electric charges interacting via photons.

I think the next step to your understanding is to look at the force on a charge moving in an electro-magnetic field. The equation describing that is: $$\vec F = q(\vec E + \vec v \times \vec B)$$... where v is the velocity of the charge and q is the amount of charge. E and B are the electric and magnetic field vectors - which will usually differ at different points in space. The cross product means that the magnetic force acts perpendicularly to the field and the velocity.

An electric current, in this picture, is a whole lot of charges moving along the wire at some speed - so this should help you understand the relationship between the force on the current and individual magnetic fields.

The relationship between electric and magnetic fields gets clearer when you learn about relativity.

Later on you'll also learn about intrinsic magnetic dipole moments and how atoms can act as small magnets... this is what gives rise to the usual magnetism of magnets that you are used to. But right now, you are still exploring the phenomena.
 
Last edited:
The book claims the answer is that all the magnitudes are the same because "the gravitational force on the penguin is the same". I'm having trouble understanding this. I thought the buoyant force was equal to the weight of the fluid displaced. Weight depends on mass which depends on density. Therefore, due to the differing densities the buoyant force will be different in each case? Is this incorrect?

Similar threads

Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 31 ·
2
Replies
31
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
16
Views
1K
  • · Replies 40 ·
2
Replies
40
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
14
Views
3K