Understanding the Limit of Natural Log: ln(x^2-16) as x Approaches 4+

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The limit of the function ln(x^2-16) as x approaches 4 from the right is definitively -∞. This conclusion is reached by substituting t = x^2 - 16, which approaches 0 as x approaches 4+. The limit then transforms to lim t->0+ ln(t), where ln(0) is undefined, confirming that the limit approaches negative infinity. The reasoning is supported by the understanding that the natural logarithm of zero cannot be defined, as it represents a value that e raised to any power cannot achieve.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of limits in calculus
  • Familiarity with natural logarithms and their properties
  • Knowledge of substitution methods in limit evaluation
  • Basic graphing skills to visualize functions
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of natural logarithms and their limits
  • Learn about the epsilon-delta definition of limits
  • Explore the concept of indeterminate forms in calculus
  • Review techniques for evaluating limits involving logarithmic functions
USEFUL FOR

Students studying calculus, particularly those focusing on limits and logarithmic functions, as well as educators seeking to clarify concepts related to natural logarithms and limit evaluation techniques.

Painguy
Messages
118
Reaction score
0
Determine the infinite limit.
lim x->4+ ln(x^2-16)

I know from graphing the equation and doing a table that the limit is -infinity, but my book is saying to do the following.

Let t = x^2-16, Then as x->4+, t->0+, and lim x->4+ ln(x^2-16)=lim t->0+ ln(t) by 3
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I think it is just substituting in t for the function inside the natural log to make it easier to understand. Putting 4 into the equation you get 42-16=16-16=0 so it is the limit of ln(0). Thinking about ln(0), it is undefined as it represents the number you would need to take e to the power of to get ex=0. Since this ex can never reach 0 but only approach it, ln(0) is undefined and you limit is, as you thought, -∞.

Unless I'm totally wrong.
 
Gallagher said:
I think it is just substituting in t for the function inside the natural log to make it easier to understand. Putting 4 into the equation you get 42-16=16-16=0 so it is the limit of ln(0). Thinking about ln(0), it is undefined as it represents the number you would need to take e to the power of to get ex=0. Since this ex can never reach 0 but only approach it, ln(0) is undefined and you limit is, as you thought, -∞.

Unless I'm totally wrong.

ah i see. i guess that makes sense. It just seems rather pointless lol.
 

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K