Understanding the < > Notation for Subgroups: A Closer Look

  • Thread starter Thread starter Gear300
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Integral Set
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on the interpretation of the notation for a set S in group theory, specifically in the context of subgroups. The subgroup <9, 12> of the integers under addition is established to contain all multiples of 3, derived from the linear combinations of 9 and 12. Participants clarify that represents the subgroup generated by elements a and b, and that this notation can be generalized to any set S, indicating the subgroup generated by S. The key conclusion is that signifies the set of all linear combinations of elements in S.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of group theory concepts, particularly subgroups
  • Familiarity with the notation for generating sets in algebra
  • Knowledge of linear combinations in the context of integers
  • Basic comprehension of greatest common divisors (gcd)
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of subgroups in group theory
  • Learn about the generation of subgroups using the gcd of integers
  • Explore the implications of linear combinations in group operations
  • Investigate the notation and definitions used in various algebraic texts
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, students of abstract algebra, and anyone interested in understanding subgroup generation and notation in group theory.

Gear300
Messages
1,209
Reaction score
9
I'm having a bit of a tough time interpreting <S> for a set S. I know for an element a, <a> is the set of all integral powers of a with respect to a given operation, but for a set S = {a, b, c}, what would <a, b, c> turn out as?

Edit: The source of my trouble is with this: The subgroup <9, 12> of the group of integers with addition as the operation contains 12 + (-9) = 3 (in order for it to be a group). Here is what the text says: "Therefore <9, 12> must contain all multiples of 3." I thought <9, 12> would only consist of multiples of 9 and 12, but apparently, there is more to it.
 
Last edited:
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Not knowing more about the group in question, I am assuming that the group operation is addition. Then \langle 9, 12 \rangle is going to be all linear combinations of 9 and 12, i,.e. 9m+12n for integers m and n. It turns out that that this is identical to the set of all multiples of 3.

I suspect that for any two intgers a and b that \langle a,b \rangle = \langle \gcd (a,b) \rangle.

--Elucidus
 
Thanks for the reply...it seems as though it never came to me anywhere in the text. I was thinking the notation for <a1, a2 ... an> was simply the set of all integral powers of the elements.

So from this, I'm assuming that < > with respect to addition can be interpreted as a linear combination between elements in the group, right?
 
Are you sure < > notation was never defined in that book? From your comments, I am guessing that (for that book) <S> means the subgroup generated by S.
 
g_edgar said:
Are you sure < > notation was never defined in that book? From your comments, I am guessing that (for that book) <S> means the subgroup generated by S.

Yup...that was part of its definition. The definition it gave was: <a> is the set of all integral powers of a for a given operation. They then went into further analysis. I just wasn't sure what <S> of a set S = {a, b, c, ...} was since the definition they gave was for a single element a.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 66 ·
3
Replies
66
Views
7K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K