Understanding the Relationship Between Spring and Hook's Law

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around understanding the relationship between spring mechanics and Hook's Law, particularly focusing on potential energy functions and the dynamics of a mass-spring system. Participants explore the integration of force to find potential energy and the implications for motion and energy conservation.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Problem interpretation, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the integration of force to derive potential energy, questioning the correctness of their negative signs and the implications for energy calculations. They explore the relationship between kinetic and potential energy in the context of a mass-spring system, raising queries about the application of Newtonian dynamics and the interpretation of results.

Discussion Status

The discussion is active, with participants providing guidance on correcting integration errors and clarifying the use of energy conservation principles. Multiple interpretations of the problem are being explored, particularly regarding the application of Newton's laws and the calculation of instantaneous power.

Contextual Notes

Participants note constraints such as the absence of time in their calculations and the need for clarity on the definitions and assumptions underlying the problem. There is an ongoing examination of the correct application of formulas related to Hooke's Law and potential energy.

~christina~
Gold Member
Messages
714
Reaction score
0
[SOLVED] Spring and Hook's law

spring question
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
I'm not sure about the negative though..is that correct? (way I integrated it)

a) calculate the potential energy function U(x)

I'm not sure what they mean by calculate but I assume they meant integrate and what I got was..

If I read correctly on that site that you linked me...the \int F_x(x)= U_x

F_x(x)= -\alpha x - \beta x^2

\alpha = 60.0 N/m
\beta = 18.0 N/ m^2

F_x(x)= - (60.0N/m)x - (18.0 N/m^2) x^2

\int F_x (x)= -\int (60.0N/m)x + (18.0N/m^2) x^2 =<br /> -(30.0N/m) x^2 - (6.0N/m^2) x^3

I'm not sure about the negative though..is that correct? (way I integrated it)

b) An object with mass m= 0.900kg on frictionless horizontal surface is atttatched to the spring and pulled a distance 1.00m to the right (+ x-direction) to the spring released . What is the speed of the object when it is 0.500m to the right of the equillibrium position?

Hm...

m= 0.900kg
x_i= 1.00m
x_f= 0.500m
v_i = 0m/s
v_f= ?m/s
to get that would I just use...

K_i + U_{si} = K_f + U_{sf} = .5 mv_i^2 + .5 mx_i^2 = .5 mv_f^2 + .5 mx_f^2

however I have U(x) ...I'm not sure how to incorperate that into the equation.
I would think that I replace the U in the equation with the equation to get...
with the numbers plugged in...

.5(0.900kg)(0m/s)^2 + (-30.0N/m)(1.00m)^2 = .5(0.900kg)(v_f)^2 + (-30.0N/m)(0.500m)^2

v_f=\sqrt{-22.5/ .45}

this would give a negative under the square root and the problem says to take the right as the positive direction so I'm thinking I should change something to a positive and thus I wouldn't get a negative but I'm not sure where that would be.
Would it be where the - is in the equation I'm using?
 
missing minus sign

You left out the minus sign in computing the potential energy function (which is why you get strange answers in part b):

U = - \int F_x(x) dx
 
Doc Al said:
You left out the minus sign in computing the potential energy function (which is why you get strange answers in part b):

U = - \int F_x(x) dx

so then I guess the negative will cancel out then... is it supposed to be like this then?

\int F_x (x)= -\int - (60.0N/m)x - (18.0N/m^2) x^2 =<br /> (30.0N/m) x^2 + (6.0N/m^2) x^3

thanks
 
Last edited:
Yes, but I'd write it this way:

U = - \int F_x (x) dx = -\int (-60.0N/m)x + (-18.0N/m^2) x^2 dx = (30.0N/m) x^2 + (6.0N/m^2) x^3 + C

Since U = 0 for x = 0, the constant of integration (C) is zero.
 
Doc Al said:
Yes, but I'd write it this way:

U = - \int F_x (x) dx = -\int (-60.0N/m)x + (-18.0N/m^2) x^2 dx = (30.0N/m) x^2 + (6.0N/m^2) x^3 + C

Since U = 0 for x = 0, the constant of integration (C) is zero.

ok. well now with the corrected eqzn

b) An object with mass m= 0.900kg on frictionless horizontal surface is atttatched to the spring and pulled a distance 1.00m to the right (+ x-direction) to the spring released . What is the speed of the object when it is 0.500m to the right of the equillibrium position?

Hm...

m= 0.900kg
x_i= 1.00m
x_f= 0.500m
v_i = 0m/s
v_f= ?m/s
to get that would I just use...

K_i + U_{si} = K_f + U_{sf} = .5 mv_i^2 + .5 kx_i^2 = .5 mv_f^2 + .5 kx_f^2

Hm..I figured out that I did something incorrect in the final equation..I didn't include the whole equation at all... thus the new equation would be...

0.5(0.900kg)(0m/s)^2 + (30.0N/m)(1.00m)^2 + (6.00N/m^2)(1.00m)^3 = 0.5(0.900kg)(v_f)^2 + (30.0N/m)(0.500m)^2 + (6.00N/m^2)(0.500m)^3

v_f= \sqrt{27.75 / (0.5*0.900)} = 7.85m/s

hm...not sure if that's right but if my math is correct it should be..


c.) Use Newtonian dynamics to find the speed at this position

what exactly do they mean by "Newtonian dynamics" ?

d.) What is the instantaneous power when x= 0.500m?

hm since I found the velocity

P_{average} = dW/ dt = F*v

hm..would I think I'd use the original force equation and then plug in x= 0.500m then multiply it by the velocity that I found for that point assuming my velocity I found is correct of course.

F_x (0.500m)= -60.0N/m (0.500m)- 18.0N/m^2 (0.500m)^2 = -34.5N

then I'd multiply that by v_{0.500}= 7.85m/s

P_{average} = dW/ dt = F*v= (34.5N)(7.85m/s)= 270.825 W


I think that's it except I don't know how to do c.)

Thanks
 
Last edited:
~christina~ said:
to get that would I just use...

K_i + U_{si} = K_f + U_{sf} = .5 mv_i^2 + .5 mx_i^2 = .5 mv_f^2 + .5 mx_f^2
This equation has spring PE terms for a Hooke law spring, not the one in this problem. But you used the correct equation when you did your calculation.

Hm..I figured out that I did something incorrect in the final equation..I didn't include the whole equation at all... thus the new equation would be...

0.5(0.900kg)(0m/s)^2 + (30.0N/m)(1.00m)^2 + (6.00N/m^2)(1.00m)^3 = 0.5(0.900kg)(v_f)^2 + (30.0N/m)(0.500m)^2 + (6.00N/m^2)(0.500m)^3

v_f= \sqrt{27.75 / (0.5*0.900)} = 7.85m/s

hm...not sure if that's right but if my math is correct it should be..
Looks good to me.


c.) Use Newtonian dynamics to find the speed at this position

what exactly do they mean by "Newtonian dynamics" ?
Beats me. Perhaps they want you to find the speed using Newton's 2nd law directly. (Which ends up being the same thing.)

d.) what is the instantaneous power when x= 0.500m?

hm since I found the velocity

P_{average} = dW/ dt = F*v

hm..would I think I'd use the original force equation and then plug in x= 0.500m then multiply it by the velocity that I found for that point assuming my velocity I found is correct of course.
Good.

F_x (0.500m)= -60.0N/m (0.500m)- 18.0N/m^2 (0.500m)^2 = -34.5N

then I'd multiply that by v_{0.500}= 7.85m/s

P_{average} = dW/ dt = F*v= (34.5N)(7.85m/s)= 270.825 W
Looks good. Don't get hung up on the minus sign in the force equation. That just means the force acts to the left. But the velocity also acts to the left, so (using the same sign convention) it should also be negative.
 
Doc Al said:
This equation has spring PE terms for a Hooke law spring, not the one in this problem. But you used the correct equation when you did your calculation.

ok

Beats me. Perhaps they want you to find the speed using Newton's 2nd law directly. (Which ends up being the same thing.)

F= ma ?
I know that

F= ma= m(v/t)

t(F/m)= v

but I don't have the time...so I really don't get how would I find the velocity using F= ma

I don't exactly have the time though...how would I go about finding the velocity?

Looks good. Don't get hung up on the minus sign in the force equation. That just means the force acts to the left. But the velocity also acts to the left, so (using the same sign convention) it should also be negative.

oh...yup I was confused about that...


Thanks a lot :smile:
 
  • #10
Um..well since you didn't say anything about how to find the time...

since in F= ma

I have
d
v

but no t

v= d/t

t= d/v

I thought that I use that but

if I was trying to find the v from just the information given would I be able to find it?

In the beginning all I had was the distance, force, and potential energy...

how would I get velocity from that since I don't have the time or acceration?
 
  • #11
  • #12
oh...how interesting...

THANKS FOR ALL YOUR HELP Doc Al :smile:
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
755
Replies
7
Views
4K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K