Understanding the Yukawa Term in Srednicki's Lepton Sector

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter parton
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Lepton Srednicki
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the Yukawa term in Srednicki's treatment of the lepton sector, specifically the expression \(\mathcal{L}_{\text{Yuk}} = - y \varepsilon^{ij} \varphi_{i} l_{j} \overline{e} + \text{h.c.}\). Participants clarify that the minus sign in the Yukawa term is not significant at the current stage, as the Yukawa coupling constant \(y\) can be chosen arbitrarily. However, once the Higgs field acquires a vacuum expectation value, the sign of the Yukawa coupling becomes relevant, as it relates to the fermion mass. The discussion emphasizes the importance of understanding representations in the context of SU(2) and U(1) symmetries.

PREREQUISITES
  • Familiarity with Srednicki's "The Standard Model" and its chapter on the lepton sector.
  • Understanding of SU(2) and U(1) gauge theories and their representations.
  • Knowledge of Yukawa interactions and their role in particle physics.
  • Concept of vacuum expectation values (vev) in the context of the Higgs mechanism.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the implications of Yukawa couplings in the context of the Higgs mechanism.
  • Learn about the role of vacuum expectation values in particle mass generation.
  • Explore the mathematical properties of Weyl fields and their representations in gauge theories.
  • Investigate the relationship between fermion masses and Yukawa coupling constants in the Standard Model.
USEFUL FOR

Particle physicists, graduate students studying the Standard Model, and anyone interested in the mathematical framework of Yukawa interactions and their implications for fermion masses.

parton
Messages
79
Reaction score
1
Hi all,

I am just reading Srednicki, chapter 88: The Standard Model: Lepton Sector
and I'm not sure if I really understand it.

There are left-handed Weyl fields
l, \overline{e}, \varphi

in the (SU(2), U(1)) representations
(2, -1/2), (1,1), (2, -1/2)

Now there is also a Yukawa term of the form
\mathcal{L}_{\text{Yuk}} = - y \varepsilon^{ij} \varphi_{i} l_{j} \overline{e} + \text{h.c.}

but I don't understand where this minus sign comes from.

I have the following guess: I could also write this term in the form:
\mathcal{L}_{\text{Yuk}} = y \varphi^{j} l_{j} \overline{e} + \text{h.c.}

Using \varphi^{j} l_{j} = \varepsilon^{ji} \varphi_{i} l_{j} = - \varepsilon^{ij} \varphi_{i} l_{j}

we obtain the Yukawa term above with the minus sign.

But if this is really right, \varphi^{i} would be in the (\overline{2}, -1/2) representation, which is equivalent to (2,-1/2)

But is the U(1) quantum number -1/2 uneffected by raising or lowering the index (it is just an SU(2) index, isn't it?) ?
This number would only change, if we consider the Hermitian adjoint,
(\varphi_{i})^{\dagger} = \varphi^{\dagger} \, ^{i} which would be in the representation
(2, +1/2)

I hope someone could tell whether my thoughts are right or wrong.

Thanks in advance :)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Not sure if I understand what you mean. The Yukawa coupling constant is just an arbitrary number at this point, it does not matter which sign it has. Its not like the kinetic terms where the prefactor has a specific fixed value. The Yukawa interaction is parameterized by one parameter, you can choose a way to write it. This changes as soon as the Higgs field acquires a vacuum expectation value, because then you can identify the Yukawa coupling y with something like fermion mass over Higgs vev, both well measured quantities. Then you have to care about which sign your mass has, and choose the sign of the Yukawa coupling constant accordingly.

Hope these ramblings help...
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
1K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K