Understanding Time: A Scientific Approach

  • Context: High School 
  • Thread starter Thread starter GusAmancio
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Science Time
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

This discussion centers on the evaluation of a video claiming to provide a unique perspective on the nature of time. Forum members quickly identify the video's creator as a "crackpot," highlighting the importance of adhering to established scientific principles. The consensus is that personal theories lacking rigorous scientific backing are not credible and should not be trusted. The thread concludes with a reminder that speculation is not permitted on Physics Forums.

PREREQUISITES
  • Basic understanding of physics concepts
  • Familiarity with the scientific method
  • Knowledge of the Crackpot Index
  • Awareness of Physics Forums guidelines
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the scientific method and its application in physics
  • Study the Crackpot Index to identify pseudoscientific claims
  • Explore established theories of time in modern physics
  • Review the guidelines and rules of Physics Forums for engaging in discussions
USEFUL FOR

This discussion is beneficial for students of physics, educators, and anyone interested in distinguishing credible scientific discourse from pseudoscientific claims.

GusAmancio
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
I came across this video on the recommendation of a friend. I don't have a complete understanding of physics, but I like to think I'm pretty smart when it comes to understanding it at a base level. Regardless, the video tries to explain what time really is, and I was wondering if anyone had a more scientific approach to understanding these claims, and whether they comport with actual science.

Thanks all!

<crackpot link deleted>
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Gus, welcome to PF. I only had to watch a few seconds of the video to know that the guy is a crackpot. Anyone who begins a video with "I have my own theory of physics" and "I found something that physicists have overlooked" registers high on the Crackpot Index.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: wabbit
I could go on for as long as this guy went on talking about how he has fundamental flaws in his physics understanding, but that would simply be a waste of time just like watching this was. Bottom line: Do not trust everything you find on the internet.

Speculation and personal theories such as the one this person engages in are against Physics Forums rules and this thread is therefore closed.
 

Similar threads

High School Question about "odometer" analogy and time dilation
  • · Replies 34 ·
2
Replies
34
Views
2K
Graduate Help me understand why “Block Universe” is not scientifically proven
  • · Replies 45 ·
2
Replies
45
Views
10K
High School Is Special Relativity Universally Accepted?
  • · Replies 46 ·
2
Replies
46
Views
5K
High School Relativity and Biological Aging: How Time Dilation Slows Cell Activity
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
High School Pole-barn paradox, one question
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K
High School Apparent contradiction in time dilation
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
High School Time & Special Relativity: Is Time Object-Specific?
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
2K
Graduate Popular Pseudoscience Video on General Relativity: Analysis & Criticism
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
High School Mechanics behind curved time causing gravitation/geodesics
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
8K
High School Theories about light and time near a black hole
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
3K