Understanding Transformer Phasor Diagrams

Click For Summary
The discussion revolves around the challenges of understanding transformer phasor diagrams, particularly in relation to computed data for a specific transformer problem. The user presents a detailed breakdown of calculations for rated currents, copper and core losses, and secondary voltage, ultimately leading to confusion regarding the proportional representation of voltages in the phasor diagram. Despite successfully computing values such as the secondary voltage drop and losses, discrepancies arise when comparing the expected and drawn values in the diagram. The conversation concludes with a resolution, as the user expresses gratitude for the assistance received, indicating a newfound understanding of the topic.
Peter Alexander
Messages
26
Reaction score
3
Hello everyone! I'm currently studying transformers and a task related to phasor diagrams shows up. I'm having lots of problems with comprehension of the subject, so I'd like to ask for some help. I don't understand how the phasor diagram given as a solution could possibly be drawn out of the computed data.

1. The problem statement, all variables, and given/known data
Task gives the following data:
  • ##S_n = 1\text{MVA}, \quad 10\text{kV} / 0.4\text{kV}, \quad f=50\text{Hz}##
  • ##P_{Cun} = 15\text{kW}, \quad P_0 = 5\text{kW}##
  • ##u_K = 6\text{%}##
  • Current through the secondary coil ##I_2 = 1000A## at ##\cos{\phi_2} = 0.5##, inductive
And requires computation of losses in copper on secondary side (this represents windings), iron (this represents the core) as well as actual value of ##U'_2##.

Homework Equations


All relevant equations will be present in the attempt at a solution.

The Attempt at a Solution


I believe that it's best for the solution to come in sequential steps instead of a long essay.
  1. Compute the rated currents ##I_{1n} = \frac{S_n}{U_1\sqrt{3}} = 57.34\text{A}## and ##I_{2n} = \frac{S_n}{U_2\sqrt{3}} = 1443.4\text{A}##
  2. Winding losses for secondary coil are therefore ##P_{Cu} = P_{Cun}\cdot (\frac{I_2}{I_{2n}})^2 = 7200\text{W}##
  3. Core losses are computed as ##P_{Fe} = P_{Fen}\cdot\frac{f'}{f_n}\cdot(\frac{B'}{B_n})^2## but since ##U_1' = 1.1 U_1## we can deduce that ##f'B' = 1.1 f_n B_n## consequently leading to ##P_{Fe}=P_{Fen}\cdot\frac{f'}{f_n}\cdot (1.1\cdot\frac{f_n}{f'})^2 = 5042\text{W}##
  4. As a result, ##E_2' = 1.1 \cdot U_2 = 1.1 \cdot E_2n = 440\text{V}##
  5. For ##U'_2##, we need the following values: ##u_K = 6\text{%}##, ##u_R = \frac{P_Cun}{S_n} = 1.5\text{%}## and ##u_X = \sqrt{u_K^2 - u_R^2} = 5.81\text{%}##.
  6. We require a ratio ##\frac{I_2}{I_{2n}} = 0.6929## which is preserved even on the primary side, making ##I_1 = 0.6929 \cdot I_{1n} = 39.73\text{A}##.
  7. From here on, I'm starting to get lost. From known ratio, we can compute ##u'_R = 1.039\text{%}##, ##u'_X = 4.025\text{%}## and ##u_K = 4.157\text{%}##, where all we did was to multiply previous values by the factor ##0.6929##.
  8. This equation is given on the datasheet and it describes the voltage drop on secondary side ##\Delta U##. It can also be derived from the Kapp triangle using points on the diagram (will attach it below). Computational procedure is $$\Delta U = U_2 \cdot (
    u'_{R}\cos\phi_{2}+u'_{X}\sin\phi_{2}+U_{1}-\sqrt{U_{1}^{2}-(u'_{X}\cos\phi_{2}-u'_{R}\sin\phi_{2})^{2}}\cong4\text{\%}) = 17.6\text{V}$$ meaning that ##U'_2 = E'_2 - \Delta U = 422.4\text{V}##
Now if we take a look at the phasor diagram (should be attached below), proportions don't add up, because if ##U'_1 = 1100\text{V}##, then how can ##U'_2##, which should be ##422.4\text{V}##, be drawn as if it measures ##\approx 660\text{V}##?

Any sort of help would me more than appreciated.
 

Attachments

  • Phasor_Diagram.png
    Phasor_Diagram.png
    5.3 KB · Views: 644
Physics news on Phys.org
upload_2018-5-21_14-12-2.png

From the attached Single-Phase Transformer Diagram where:
Vp=primary rated voltage
Rp=primary windings resistance
Xp=primary windings magnetic flux leakage reactance
Xm= main magnetic flux reactance
Rfe= equivalent resistance of magnetic losses
Ip=primary load current
Io=primary windings main magnetic flux current
I's=secondary current referred to primary
V's=secondary terminals voltage referred to primary
R's=secondary windings resistance referred to primary
X's=secondary windings leakage reactance referred to primary
E1=e.m.f of primary windings
E'2=e.m.f. of seconadry windings referred to primary [E'2=E1]
Zp=Rp+jXp ; Z's=R's+jX's
Po=Rp*Io^2+E1^2/Rfe where E1^2/Rfe=Pcore
Pcore=Core loss = Hysteresis loss + Eddy current loss
Pcore=Kh.f.Bmax^n+Ke.f2.Bmax^2
If we could neglect Rp*Io^2 then Po=Pcore
If we shall neglect hysteresis loss then only eddy current loss will be:
Po=Ke.f^2.Bmax^2
Bmax=k.E1/f/Areacore
Po/Pon=Ke.f^2.Bmax^2/Ke.f^2.Bmax^2=(f/fn*Bmax/Bmaxn)^2 or:
Po/Pon=[f/fn.E1/E1n.fn/f]^2=(E1/E1n)^2
E=Vp-Zp*Ip=V's+Z's*I's
In order to calculate E we need to know Zp or Z's.
In a short-circuit case E1=E2≈0 then Zsc=Zp+Zs'
Zsc=Vp^2/S.uk%/100
So what we can know it is only Zsc and we don't know what is Zp and Zs' separate.
Let's say Zp=Z's=Zsc/2
Now we could calculate E1/E1n and recalculate Po.
The resistance and reactance it could be considered constant.
 

Attachments

  • upload_2018-5-21_14-12-2.png
    upload_2018-5-21_14-12-2.png
    4.8 KB · Views: 720
  • Like
Likes Peter Alexander
upload_2018-5-22_19-32-42.png
 

Attachments

  • upload_2018-5-22_19-32-42.png
    upload_2018-5-22_19-32-42.png
    7.1 KB · Views: 735
  • Like
Likes Peter Alexander
This was actually incredibly helpful! Thank you for your time and patience! I finally understand how it works, thank you!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
5K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K