Understanding Ultrasound Focus and Intensity in Tissue Exposure

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter chirhone
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Focus Ultrasound
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the concept of ultrasound focus and intensity, particularly in relation to tissue exposure during medical procedures. Participants explore the similarities and differences between ultrasound and other forms of radiation, such as X-rays, in terms of intensity distribution and tissue interaction.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions whether ultrasound focus behaves like light rays, suggesting that intensity is strongest at the focus and inquires about the exposure levels when only part of the ultrasound beam passes through tissue.
  • Another participant elaborates on the concept of power flux in ultrasound beams, indicating that focusing increases flux density at the focal point, while also noting differences between ultrasound and X-ray technology in terms of tissue interaction.
  • A participant mentions that ultrasound energy can be focused effectively and typically passes through tissue with minimal loss, contrasting this with the behavior of X-rays which interact with all tissue due to similar impedance.
  • Discussion includes the use of advanced technologies like the Cyberknife, which employs multiple ultrasound beams for precise targeting in treatments, highlighting the selective nature of ultrasound compared to radiotherapy.
  • One participant humorously affirms the definition of "focus," suggesting that it is a straightforward concept, although this comment does not contribute to the technical discussion.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express varying levels of understanding regarding the nature of ultrasound focus and its comparison to light and X-rays. There is no consensus on the specifics of intensity distribution or the implications for tissue exposure, indicating ongoing debate and exploration of the topic.

Contextual Notes

Some assumptions about the behavior of ultrasound in tissue and comparisons to other radiation types remain unresolved. The discussion does not clarify the mathematical or physical principles underlying the intensity distribution in ultrasound beams.

chirhone
Messages
300
Reaction score
25
Is ultrasound focus just like light rays where the intensity is strongest in the focus? How much is the exposure when the tissue has only a partial ultrasound beam passing (like cross section, imagine 1/4 of beam sides) through it. For example. The focus of the ultrasound is deep in the kidney at center. But the sides of the kidney is still exposed to part of the ultrasound beam. What intensity is it in comparison to the focus?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
chirhone said:
Is ultrasound focus just like light rays where the intensity is strongest in the focus? How much is the exposure when the tissue has only a partial ultrasound beam passing (like cross section, imagine 1/4 of beam sides) through it. For example. The focus of the ultrasound is deep in the kidney at center. But the sides of the kidney is still exposed to part of the ultrasound beam. What intensity is it in comparison to the focus?
The power flux across the beam will divide up in the same way for all 'beams'. Focussing a beam will mean that the highest flux density will be in the focal point / region. However, there is a difference between US and, for example X Ray technology. The Energy in an X Ray beam will interact with all tissue it comes into contact with because it all has a very similar impedance (same amount of water and same basic cells).

In radiotherapy, the focussing needs to be much more extreme. X rays cannot be easily focused with any lens or mirror so the focussing has to be done 'mechanically'.For instance, they often use three or more directions sequentially from the same source (e.g. strange down into the abdomen and from either side, with the target where they intersect.)

The Cyberknife uses multiple (dozens of?) beams and the beams follow the
movement of the organ being treated by using Ultrasound (?) during the treatment session
The energy in a US beam can be focussed (the US images of internal images are quite high res) and mostly pass through tissue with not too much loss / reflection so not much energy will be absorbed locally by living tissue.

But when a beam of US energy encounters a kidney stone, the material is very different and there will be a strong reflection. The momentum of the beam will be transferred to the stone and it will be mechanically moved and fractured. So it has to be a much more selective technology than Radiotherapy.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: chirhone
Is ultrasound focus just like light rays where the intensity is strongest in the focus?
That is pretty much what "focus" means. When your teacher tells you to "focus" he/she does not mean "pay less attention"!
 
HallsofIvy said:
That is pretty much what "focus" means. When your teacher tells you to "focus" he/she does not mean "pay less attention"!
Sorry, I was just looking out of the window. What did you say?? :wink:
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 94 ·
4
Replies
94
Views
16K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K