Understanding Upper Triangular, Lower, and Diagonal Matrices

  • Thread starter Thread starter JasonRox
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Matrix
Click For Summary
A diagonal matrix features nonzero entries solely on its diagonal, while an upper triangular matrix has nonzero entries on or above the diagonal. The discussion highlights the distinction between these types of matrices and mentions the concept of strictly upper triangular matrices, which are nilpotent and serve as counterexamples to diagonalizability. The conversation also touches on the potential geometric interpretations and special classifications, such as Cartan and parabolic subgroups. Understanding these matrix types is essential for advanced mathematical concepts and applications. The exploration of these matrix forms reveals their significance in linear algebra and related fields.
JasonRox
Homework Helper
Gold Member
Messages
2,381
Reaction score
4
I know what an Augmented Matrix is, but what is Upper Triangular Matrix(or Lower) and a Diagonal Matrix?

This would help.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
A diagonal matrix is a matrix whose nonzero entries lie on the diagonal.

<br /> \left(<br /> \begin{array}{ccc}<br /> 1&amp;0&amp;0 \\<br /> 0&amp;5&amp;0 \\<br /> 0&amp;0&amp;0<br /> \end{array}<br /> \right)<br />

An upper triangular matrix is one whose nonzero entries all lie on or above the diagonal.

<br /> \left(<br /> \begin{array}{ccc}<br /> 1&amp;14&amp;0 \\<br /> 0&amp;5&amp;-3 \\<br /> 0&amp;0&amp;0<br /> \end{array}<br /> \right)<br />
 
Thanks.

Now, I understand why they keep flipping them around. Seems useless to do that, but I guess that's how its done.
 
matt grime might tell us the geometry, or other special interest of these classes of matrices. i.e. words like "cartan subgroup" or "parabolic subgroup" and so on come to mind...

strictly upper triangular matrices are also interesting because they are "nilpotent" hence counterexamples to diagonalizability.
 
Thread 'How to define a vector field?'
Hello! In one book I saw that function ##V## of 3 variables ##V_x, V_y, V_z## (vector field in 3D) can be decomposed in a Taylor series without higher-order terms (partial derivative of second power and higher) at point ##(0,0,0)## such way: I think so: higher-order terms can be neglected because partial derivative of second power and higher are equal to 0. Is this true? And how to define vector field correctly for this case? (In the book I found nothing and my attempt was wrong...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
4K
  • · Replies 34 ·
2
Replies
34
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 33 ·
2
Replies
33
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
3K