Understanding Vector Spaces in Linear Algebra

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the distinction between points and vectors in linear algebra, specifically within the context of vector spaces. The notation \(\mathbf{p} \in \mathbb{E}^n\) identifies points, while \(\mathbf{v} \in \mathbb{R}^n\) identifies vectors, highlighting their existence in different geometric spaces. This differentiation is crucial for understanding geometric constructions that are coordinate-independent. The conversation also addresses the confusion surrounding the interchangeability of \(\mathbb{E}^n\) and \(\mathbb{R}^n\) in various resources, emphasizing the importance of recognizing the distinction between affine and vector spaces.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of vector spaces and their properties
  • Familiarity with the notation \(\mathbb{E}^n\) and \(\mathbb{R}^n\)
  • Basic knowledge of geometric constructions in linear algebra
  • Concept of affine spaces versus vector spaces
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the definitions and properties of affine spaces in linear algebra
  • Study the implications of coordinate systems on vector representation
  • Explore the historical context and evolution of notation in linear algebra
  • Learn about geometric constructions that are independent of coordinates
USEFUL FOR

Students of linear algebra, educators teaching vector space concepts, and mathematicians interested in the foundational distinctions between points and vectors.

Parthalan
Messages
27
Reaction score
0
Hi,

I recently bought a new linear algebra book. I've been through the subject before, but the book I had back then glossed over the abstract details of vector spaces, amongst other things. However, I've found something questionable in the first few pages, and I was wondering if someone could give me their opinion on. It states:

To clearly identify [tex]\mathbf{p}[/tex] as a point, the notation [tex]\mathbf{p} \in \mathbb{E}^n[/tex] is used.
...
To clearly identify [tex]\mathbf{v}[/tex] as a vector, we write [tex]\mathbf{v} \in \mathbb{R}^n[/tex]
...
Points and vectors are different geometric entities. This is reiterated by saying they live in different spaces, [tex]\mathbb{E}^n[/tex] and [tex]\mathbb{R}^n[/tex]... The primary reason for differentiating between points and vectors to achieve geometric constructions which are coordinate independent.

I've no problem with any of this, but I have never seen any mention of this distinction before. This is compounded by the fact that Wikipedia seems to use the two spaces interchangeably in a context of vectors, and MathWorld seems to say that [tex]\mathbb{E}^n[/tex] is just an older notation for [tex]\mathbb{R}^n[/tex]. Is this just a case of people carelessly confusing the two, or is this book promoting nonsense?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
This is the distinction between and "Affine" space and a "Vector" space. For example, in E2, we can talk about lines through points and the distance between points but we do not add points or multiply points by numbers.

Of course, as soon as we set up a coordinate system in a plane, we can, as in basic calculus, talk about the vector from 0 to a point and so associate a vector with a point. Then it becomes R2.
 
Perfect! Thanks, HallsofIvy.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
6K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
4K