Understanding Velocity & Relativity: A Physics-Fling

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Ultermarto
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Velocity
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

This discussion focuses on the concepts of velocity and relativity, particularly in the context of special relativity. The participants emphasize that speed is relative and that the speed of light (denoted as 'c') remains constant for all observers, regardless of their relative motion. They explore the implications of these principles, including how velocities are perceived differently based on the observer's frame of reference. The conversation highlights the importance of understanding relativistic velocity addition to grasp the complexities of motion in the universe.

PREREQUISITES
  • Basic understanding of classical mechanics and relative speeds
  • Familiarity with the concept of the speed of light (c)
  • Knowledge of special relativity principles
  • Introduction to relativistic velocity addition equations
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the principles of special relativity in detail
  • Learn about relativistic velocity addition and its equations
  • Explore the implications of mass increase at relativistic speeds
  • Investigate the effects of time dilation in high-speed travel scenarios
USEFUL FOR

Students of physics, educators, and anyone interested in understanding the fundamental concepts of relativity and the nature of motion in the universe.

Ultermarto
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Ever since, err, hmm. I'm not entirely sure when it happened, but recently I've been on a physics-fling, and I've been trying to get a better grip on the mathematical side of physics, towards the goal of eventually understanding relativity and quantum mechanics beyond the point of "Stuff slows down when it speeds up" or "The electron goes through both slits and interacts with itself!". Even though I excelled at maths back in secondary school, it was an awful school, so as of now my grips on areas like calculus are ... well, they never really told us what that was. So equations don't exactly sink in. (But earlier, I completely understood the W1/w2 = d2/d1 lever principle. That's a big deal for me.)

One thing I do understand is relative speeds, as in the classical ones. Right now my velocity relative to the ground beneath me is 0, but that ground is orbiting the sun pretty damn fast, and the sun is thought to be orbiting the center of the milky way even faster, and since I am included in all of these motions, I could be said to have any of their velocities, depending on what you're comparing me to. Meanwhile, the bits and pieces I read about relativity talk about the speed of light and how we can't exceed it (because if we ever reached it, for some reason, our mass would become infinite). But in what way am I not traveling very very fast, at least at something that compares to the speed of light, right now, as the Earth orbits the sun and galaxies are driven apart by space at, as I understand it, close to the speed of light? And then again, am I really traveling at any velocity, or is the universe just moving around me at speeds close to light? Ho do the laws of physics check on my movement through space, with no true frame of reference, and say "He's traveling at 1/2 the speed of light, better increase his mass and slow the passage of time for him"? How do scientists look at our civilizations here on Earth, decide that velocities here are 0, and that if we add 300,000,000 meters of delta-v weird stuff will start happening?

Or does the weird stuff only happen with respect to the people back on earth, whilst a theoretical asteroid planet zooming through the solar system at the same speed will see our spacecraft fly by in the expected way?

Or maybe it has something to do with light always hitting us at the same speed?

Please help me.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Ultermarto said:
One thing I do understand is relative speeds, as in the classical ones. Right now my velocity relative to the ground beneath me is 0, but that ground is orbiting the sun pretty damn fast, and the sun is thought to be orbiting the center of the milky way even faster, and since I am included in all of these motions, I could be said to have any of their velocities, depending on what you're comparing me to.
Right you are... and accepting that might be the single hardest part of special relativity.

Meanwhile, the bits and pieces I read about relativity talk about the speed of light and how we can't exceed it[STRIKE] (because if we ever reached it, for some reason, our mass would become infinite)[/STRIKE]. But in what way am I not traveling very very fast, at least at something that compares to the speed of light, right now, as the Earth orbits the sun and galaxies are driven apart by space at, as I understand it, close to the speed of light?

Forget the struck-out part above; it's misleading enough to be unhelpful.

Instead, you have to mate your correct understanding that speed is relative with another somewhat counterintuitive fact: The speed of light is c for all observers regardless of their relative motion. For example, if you are moving at .5c relative to me, and I send a light signal in your direction of motion:
1) You will consider yourself to be at rest while I am moving in one direction at a speed of .5c relative to you and the light signal is moving in the other direction at a speed of c relative to you.
2) I will consider myself to be at rest while you are moving in one direction at a speed of .5c relative to me and the light signal is moving in the same direction at c.

For more information and the equations, you can google for "relativistic velocity addition".
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 57 ·
2
Replies
57
Views
4K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
3K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
2K
  • · Replies 51 ·
2
Replies
51
Views
5K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
3K