Understanding Weyl Rule: A Comprehensive Guide with References and Equations

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter MathematicalPhysicist
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Weyl
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the Weyl rule, specifically focusing on references and equations related to its derivation and application. Participants seek clarification on mathematical expressions and their implications in the context of differential geometry.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Mathematical reasoning
  • Homework-related

Main Points Raised

  • One participant requests help in citing the correct reference for deriving the Weyl rule, specifically referencing a paper by Berry.
  • Another participant provides a link to a comprehensive resource that may contain relevant information about the Weyl rule.
  • A participant presents a mathematical expression for the curvature of a contour line from Berry's paper and compares it to a known formula from differential geometry.
  • The same participant attempts to derive a relationship between the curvature expressions and seeks clarification on their calculations involving determinants and derivatives.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

The discussion does not appear to reach a consensus, as participants are exploring different aspects of the Weyl rule and its mathematical implications without resolving the questions raised.

Contextual Notes

Participants express uncertainty regarding the application of differential geometry concepts to the curvature expression provided in Berry's paper, and there are unresolved mathematical steps in the derivation presented.

Who May Find This Useful

This discussion may be useful for those interested in the Weyl rule, differential geometry, and mathematical physics, particularly in the context of academic research or advanced studies in these fields.

Physics news on Phys.org
Thanks.
 
Another question I have from the same paper by Berry, in page 3032 in the section on curvatures of nodal lines, he writes that the curvature of a contour line u, at a point r is given by:
[tex]\kappa(r)=\frac{(u_x)^2u_{xx}+(u_y)^2 u_{yy} -2 u_x u_y u_{xy}}{|\nabla u|^3}[/tex]

Now I know from elementary differential geometry, that for two dimensional curve, the curvature is given by:
[tex]\kappa=\frac{det(\gamma ' | \gamma '')}{|\gamma ' |^3}[/tex]

Now if I apply it to the above equation then presumably, [tex]\nabla u =(u_x,u_y)= \gamma ' (t)=(x'(t),y'(t))[/tex].
which means that [tex]x''(t)= u_{xx} x'(t) +u_{xy} y'(t)= u_{xx} u_x +u_{xy} u_y[/tex]
[tex]y''(t)= u_{yy} u_y +u_{xy} u_x[/tex], and unless I have mistaken somewhere the determinant becomes: [tex](u_x^2 -u_y^2)u_{xy}+u_x u_y(u_{yy}-u_{xx})[/tex].

Anyone care to explain?

Thanks in advance.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
4K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
4K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
5K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 62 ·
3
Replies
62
Views
12K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K