Understanding X Quantum Gate: Act on |i> State?

Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on the X quantum gate and its application to the |i> state, where participants clarify that quantum gates, including the X gate, are linear operators and not measurements. The X gate flips the qubit state from |0> to |1> and vice versa, but it does not require measuring the state beforehand. Participants emphasize that a qubit can be in a superposition of states, represented as a|0> + b|1>, and that the transformation of a linear combination of states is consistent with linear operator principles. The distinction between linear operators and measurements is highlighted as a key point of confusion, with a suggestion to explore how these concepts are implemented in real quantum computers. Understanding these differences is crucial for grasping quantum mechanics and quantum computing fundamentals.
markoX
Messages
28
Reaction score
0
Hi everybody ...
One of the one-qbit simple quantum gate is X which defined by:

X: |0> ----- |1>
|1> ----- |0>

but how does this gate ( unitary operator ) act on |i> state? (i=0 or 1)
I mean at first we have to measure what state is ( 0 or 1) and so flip them but after we know the state, it will calapse to |0> or |1>.
so X|i>=|-i> is not correct according what I said.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
markoX said:
I mean at first we have to measure what state is ( 0 or 1)
No! Quantum gates aren't measurements* -- they are, as you said, linear operators. So the transformation of a linear combination of basis states is the linear combination of transformed basis states.

(I'm not sure what you mean by the |i> state, can you elaborate? I worry that you have a wrong idea in your head about qubits...)


*: at least not in the sense you're thinking. But that's quite another topic.[/size]
 
yes,I know what you are saying but how does this linear operator made in real quantum computer?

as I learned a qbit is linear combination of two basis like a|0> + b|1> ( |a|^2 + |b|^2 = 1 ).

I can not understand differen between linear operator and measurment as you said?
 
Time reversal invariant Hamiltonians must satisfy ##[H,\Theta]=0## where ##\Theta## is time reversal operator. However, in some texts (for example see Many-body Quantum Theory in Condensed Matter Physics an introduction, HENRIK BRUUS and KARSTEN FLENSBERG, Corrected version: 14 January 2016, section 7.1.4) the time reversal invariant condition is introduced as ##H=H^*##. How these two conditions are identical?

Similar threads

  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
1K
  • · Replies 39 ·
2
Replies
39
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
8
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K