Why does the water in frozen pipes burst with no energy input?

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter SpitfireAce
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Phenomena
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers around the phenomenon of water expanding when it freezes, particularly in the context of frozen pipes bursting without an apparent energy input. Participants explore the implications of this behavior in relation to thermodynamics and misconceptions about perpetual motion.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants question how water can expand and exert enough force to burst pipes when it freezes, given that it is losing energy as it cools.
  • Others argue that the expansion of ice is due to its crystal structure, which increases volume despite the decrease in kinetic energy of the molecules.
  • A participant mentions the thermodynamic relationship involving energy changes during freezing, suggesting that ice loses internal energy as it expands.
  • Some express skepticism about the author's understanding of perpetual motion and thermodynamics, indicating that misconceptions are prevalent in the author's arguments.
  • There is a reference to classical thermodynamics, with a participant stating that the expansion of ice does not contradict energy principles.
  • Several participants criticize the author's claims and suggest that they reflect a misunderstanding of basic scientific concepts.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally disagree on the author's interpretations and assertions regarding the physics of freezing water. While some defend the scientific principles involved, others critique the author's lack of understanding. No consensus is reached on the validity of the author's claims.

Contextual Notes

Participants note that the discussion involves complex thermodynamic principles and the behavior of water as it transitions to ice, which may not be fully understood by all parties involved.

SpitfireAce
Messages
131
Reaction score
0
I found a site about this book on metaphysics or something, and the author tried to give some examples of where physics falls short or contradicts itself... this guy was clearly no scientist, but I couldn't think of a good explanation for a few things he pointed out, so maybe we can =)

"As we all know, perpetual motion machines are impossible, and claims of such devices are a clear sign of bad science. Yet our science states that an object dropped into a tunnel cut through the Earth would be accelerated to the center by gravity, then decelerated as it approached the other end, only to be accelerated down again, over and over – endlessly. This describes an actively operating mechanism that never ends and never drains a power source – an impossible perpetual motion scenario, according to today’s physics."

"How can freezing water expand, even bursting metal pipes, with no energy input to explain it? A balloon left in the sun will expand and burst, in the process doing work against the surrounding atmosphere and its elastic skin, which is balanced by the energy input from the sun, so it is no mystery. However, freezing water has no energy input -- in fact, just the opposite. Energy continually drains from the water as it cools toward freezing. So, how does the water suddenly expand with such force from within that it easily bursts metal pipes?"
 
Science news on Phys.org
SpitfireAce said:
"As we all know, perpetual motion machines are impossible, and claims of such devices are a clear sign of bad science. Yet our science states that an object dropped into a tunnel cut through the Earth would be accelerated to the center by gravity, then decelerated as it approached the other end, only to be accelerated down again, over and over – endlessly. This describes an actively operating mechanism that never ends and never drains a power source – an impossible perpetual motion scenario, according to today’s physics."

I could describe a pendulum the same way. The point is there's no way to extract energy from it.

"How can freezing water expand, even bursting metal pipes, with no energy input to explain it? A balloon left in the sun will expand and burst, in the process doing work against the surrounding atmosphere and its elastic skin, which is balanced by the energy input from the sun, so it is no mystery. However, freezing water has no energy input -- in fact, just the opposite. Energy continually drains from the water as it cools toward freezing. So, how does the water suddenly expand with such force from within that it easily bursts metal pipes?"

The water is losing energy: some is radiated as heat, and some is used to do work on the container.
 
hmmm, yeah I get the first one... but the second one... ummm... don't the H20 molecules have less KE in ice than in water since the ice is at a lower temp. than the water, shouldn't that mean that the molecules should exert less outward pressure and volume should decrease... but instead volume increases... where does the energy for this outward pressure (which is considerable enough to break pipes) come from? I think that's what he's asking
 
Last edited:
Yes, the first one is simply a misunderstanding of what a "perpetual motion machine" is and what the issues with it are. I believe kids first learn Newton's first law in junior high...

For the second one, he's just plain wrong in his assertions. There is a change in energy in a freezing pipe, quite obviously. Your freezer doesn't freeze water if it isn't plugged in. Water expands when it freezes due to the crystal structure and when a pipe full of water freezes, the pressure increases, which then also changes the freezing point and energy of the water.

This author is simply displaying his lower-than high school level understanding of science (though the specifics of what happens to water are a little complicated, the idea that it expands is known to high schoolers). Pathetic, really.
 
Last edited:
as Russ put it, the author is really pathetic... really.

for the second one, from classical thermal dynamics:
dE=Q-PdV

by expanding, the ice actually loses more internal energy, there is no contradiction at all. In the author's mindset, he should be more troubled by how other liquids shrink when freezing!
 
SpitfireAce said:
"As we all know, perpetual motion machines are impossible, and claims of such devices are a clear sign of bad science. Yet our science states that an object dropped into a tunnel cut through the Earth would be accelerated to the center by gravity, then decelerated as it approached the other end, only to be accelerated down again, over and over – endlessly."

Where does he suggest we cut this proposed tunnel? :rolleyes:
 
SpitfireAce said:
I found a site about this book on metaphysics or something, and the author tried to give some examples of where physics falls short or contradicts itself... this guy was clearly no scientist, but I couldn't think of a good explanation for a few things he pointed out, so maybe we can =)

duh, that explains a lot for his ridiculous comments!
if u call a pendulum continuing endlessly with its amplitude constant(thats what that Earth stuff is equivalent to) a perpetual machine, you really don't understand the meaning of perpetual machine!
 
SpitfireAce said:
only to be accelerated down again, over and over – endlessly

that is called SHM by SCIENTISTS
 
  • #10
Notice that the Curezone site is sponsored almost entirely by manufacturers of 'body cleansing' and 'colon newal' products; in other words, things that make you ****. The article iself had that effect on me.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K
  • · Replies 32 ·
2
Replies
32
Views
9K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
5K
  • · Replies 50 ·
2
Replies
50
Views
7K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
6K