The discussion revolves around how a non-scientist can effectively present a new theory to the scientific community, particularly in physics. Participants emphasize the importance of formal submission to reputable journals, suggesting that if the theory is genuinely groundbreaking, it should be published in high-profile journals like Nature or Physical Review Letters. There is skepticism about the likelihood of a non-expert developing a theory that surpasses established scientific understanding, with some suggesting that without mathematical rigor, the theory may lack credibility. Concerns about intellectual theft are raised, with recommendations for documenting ideas through forums or preliminary submissions to independent research platforms. The conversation also touches on the challenges faced by outsiders in gaining acceptance within the academic community and the importance of articulating ideas clearly, particularly through mathematics. Overall, the thread highlights the complexities of sharing innovative scientific ideas and the barriers that may exist for those outside the traditional academic framework.
