Union of countable sets is countable

  • Thread starter Thread starter Bipolarity
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Sets Union
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on proving that a finite union of countable sets is also countable, specifically addressing two countable sets A and B. The proof involves demonstrating the existence of an injection from the union {A+B} to the natural numbers N, leveraging the existing injections f_A and f_B. The conversation also raises the question of whether an infinite union of countable sets remains countable, indicating a need for further exploration of mappings that avoid overlaps in injections.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of countable sets and injections
  • Familiarity with set theory terminology
  • Knowledge of natural numbers and their properties
  • Basic proof techniques in mathematics
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of injections and bijections in set theory
  • Explore the concept of infinite unions of sets and their countability
  • Learn about Cantor's theorem and its implications for countable sets
  • Investigate examples of countable and uncountable sets in mathematical literature
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, students studying set theory, and anyone interested in the foundations of mathematics and the properties of countable sets.

Bipolarity
Messages
773
Reaction score
2

Homework Statement


Prove that a finite union of countable sets is also countable. Is an infinite union of countable sets also countable?

Homework Equations


A set S is countable if and only if there exists an injection from S to N.

The Attempt at a Solution


I will attempt prove it for the case of 2 sets. Proving it for a finite collection of sets follows analogously. Suppose the countable sets are A and B. Then there are injections f_{A} and f_{B} from A to N and B to N respectively. We need to show the existence of an injection from {A+B} to N where + denotes union.

Since {A+B} is the union of A and B, certainly it contains an element that is in at least A or in B (or in both A and B). Then each element of {A+B} has an injective mapping to N, since each element of {A+B} is in A or in B.

Does this complete the proof? Is this rigorous?

And what about the case for an infinite union?

BiP
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi BiP! :smile:
Bipolarity said:
Then each element of {A+B} has an injective mapping to N, since each element of {A+B} is in A or in B.

Sorry, but that doesn't make any sense :redface:

Why don't you try to construct a mapping? :wink:
 
You need a mapping that avoids mapping an element of A-B and an element of B-A to the same element in N.
 

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K