Unique Elements of Relatively Prime Order

  • Thread starter Thread starter e(ho0n3
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Elements Prime
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves a group G and an element g with order |g| = mn, where m and n are relatively prime. The objective is to demonstrate the existence of unique elements a and b in G such that g = ab = ba, with |a| = m and |b| = n.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Conceptual clarification

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the implications of the gcd condition and the uniqueness of integers s and t that satisfy ms + nt = 1. There are attempts to establish the orders of a and b and their relationships to g.

Discussion Status

The discussion is active, with participants exploring various aspects of the problem, including the uniqueness of elements and their orders. Some have provided insights into proving uniqueness and the relationships between the elements, while others are questioning assumptions and seeking clarification on specific points.

Contextual Notes

Participants are navigating the implications of the gcd condition and the uniqueness of certain integers, which are central to the problem. There is an ongoing examination of how these factors influence the orders of the elements in question.

e(ho0n3
Messages
1,349
Reaction score
0
Homework Statement
Let G be a group and let g be an element G such that |g| = mn, where gcd(m, n) = 1. Show that there are unique elements a, b in G such that g = ab = ba and |a| = m and |b| = n.

The attempt at a solution
Since gcd(m, n) = 1, there are integers s and t such that ms + nt = 1. Hence g = gms+nt = gmsgnt. Let a = gnt and b = gms. Then g = ab = ba. We also have that |a| ≤ m and |b| ≤ n.

I'm having trouble showing that |a| = m and |b| = n. Also, the fact that s and t are not unique proves that a and b are not unique right? This is as my thought process has taken me. Any tips?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
e(ho0n3 said:
Since gcd(m, n) = 1, there are integers s and t such that ms + nt = 1.

I'm having trouble showing that |a| = m and |b| = n. Also, the fact that s and t are not unique proves that a and b are not unique right?

Hi e(ho0n3! :smile:

s and t are unique (to prove it, assume they're not).

And |a| must be a factor of mn, so … ? :smile:
 
tiny-tim said:
s and t are unique (to prove it, assume they're not).
I don't think so: Take m = 7 and n = 11. Then gcd(7, 11) = 1 and 7(-3) + 11(2) = 7(8) + 11(-5) = 1.

And |a| must be a factor of mn, so … ? :smile:
Why must it be a factor of mn?
 
Notice that |g^m| = |g|/gcd(|g|, m) = n. So |g^(ms)|=<fill blank>. Similarly, |g^(nt)|=<fill blank>.

So now you've found the appropriate a and b. To show uniqueness, suppose that g=a'b'=b'a' and |a'|=m and |b'|=n, then show that a'=a and b'=b. The fact that |a'|=|a|=m and |b'|=|b|=n is important here.
 
We have that |b| = mn / gcd(mn, ms) = n / gcd(n, s) and |a| = mn / gcd(mn, nt) = m / gcd(m, t). Are you suggesting that gcd(n, s) = gcd(m, t) = 1 because ms + nt = 1?

Concerning uniqueness, I've managed to get bm = (b')m from (ab)m = (a'b')m and similarly an =(a')n. How do I continue.
 
Are you suggesting that gcd(n, s) = gcd(m, t) = 1 because ms + nt = 1?
If gcd(n,s)>1, what could you say about ms + nt?

How do I continue.
Use your existing information.
 
CoCoA said:
If gcd(n,s)>1, what could you say about ms + nt?
I could say that gcd(n,s) divides ms + nt since it divides ms and nt, but this means it would divide 1, which is impossible. I get it know.

Use your existing information.
Somehow I need to get rid of the n in an = (a')n. I'm thinking of the following: Consider the cyclic group <a>. Since <a> has order m and n is relatively prime to m, we must have <an> = <a>. We also get that <(a')n> = <a'>, hence <a> = <a'> and a = a'?
 
You already used the trick required here: b = bnt bms.
 
Ah, right! That hadn't occurred to me. Thanks a lot.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K