What is the extension of the Unique Factorization Theorem to Gaussian Integers?

Click For Summary
The Unique Factorization Theorem (UFT) applies to Gaussian integers, stating that their representation as a product of primes is unique except for the order of factors and units. However, the UFT does not hold universally for all integers, as demonstrated by examples like -6, which can be factored in multiple ways. While Gaussian integers have unique factorization up to units (1, i, -1, -i), they can factor differently than rational integers, such as 2 being prime in the integers but factored as (1 + i)(1 - i) in Gaussian integers. Some number systems, like Z[sqrt(n)], do not maintain unique factorization. The discussion highlights the complexities and nuances of extending UFT to different integer domains.
huba
Messages
32
Reaction score
0
I am not sure I fully understand the extension of the Unique Factorization Theorem (UFT) to Gaussian Integers (GI), by saying that the representation of a GI as a product of primes is unique except for the order of factors and the presence of units.

Is there a similar problem when the UFT is extended to integers?
For example, -6 can be represented as -2*3 or 2*-3 or -1*2*3, or -1*-2*-3.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
I am very confused by your question! The "Unique Factorization Theorem" extended to Gaussian integers? The "Unique Factorization Theorem" does not hold for the Gaussian integers: there exist distinct factorizations of some Gaussian integers. I can't think of an example offhand but I don't think it is terribly difficult.
 
I was reading W.J. LeVeque's Elementary Theory of Numbers. Theorem 6-8 says what I said.
 
A nonzero (rational) integer has a unique factorization up to order and the presence of units (1 and -1).

Gaussian integers similarly have unique factorization up to order and units (1, i, -1, -i). Gaussian integers factor 'further' then rational integers, though: 2 is a prime rational integer, but 2 = (1 + i)(1 - i) in the Gaussian integers.

Most Z[sqrt(n)] do not have unique factorization, though.
 
HallsofIvy said:
I am very confused by your question! The "Unique Factorization Theorem" extended to Gaussian integers? The "Unique Factorization Theorem" does not hold for the Gaussian integers: there exist distinct factorizations of some Gaussian integers. I can't think of an example offhand but I don't think it is terribly difficult.

Eh?? The Gaussian integers are a Euclidean domain, so of course they're a ufd
 
LukeD said:
Eh??

Hush, Halls was thinking of \mathbb{Z}[\sqrt{-5}].
 
I am studying the mathematical formalism behind non-commutative geometry approach to quantum gravity. I was reading about Hopf algebras and their Drinfeld twist with a specific example of the Moyal-Weyl twist defined as F=exp(-iλ/2θ^(μν)∂_μ⊗∂_ν) where λ is a constant parametar and θ antisymmetric constant tensor. {∂_μ} is the basis of the tangent vector space over the underlying spacetime Now, from my understanding the enveloping algebra which appears in the definition of the Hopf algebra...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
614
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 33 ·
2
Replies
33
Views
4K
  • · Replies 35 ·
2
Replies
35
Views
5K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
4K