Unique to within a constant factor?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter cks
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Constant
Join the discussion
Registration is free. Ask a follow-up in this thread, or start your own.
4 replies · 4K views
cks
Messages
164
Reaction score
0
unique to within a constant factor?

we always listen to the phrase in quantum mechanics textbook that says this eigenvector is unique to within a constant factor.

What does it actually mean?

unique means there is one and only one??
constant factor: a constant 2 or 3 or... maybe??

I don't really catch the physical picture of it, I just hope for some mathematical examples that can illustrate this. Thank you
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Well, suppose that [tex]\left| a \rangle[/tex] is an eigenvector to an operator  with eigenvalue [itex]a[/itex], that is:
[tex]\hat A \left| a \rangle = a \left| a \rangle[/tex].
Then of course, since scalars commute with any operator,
[tex]\hat A \left( \lambda \left| a \rangle \right) =<br /> \lambda \left( \hat A \left| a \rangle \right) = \lambda \left( a \left| a \rangle \right) =<br /> a \left( \lambda \left| a \rangle \right)[/tex].
So as you see, [tex]\lambda \left| a \rangle[/tex] is also an eigenvector for the same eigenvalue, for any (complex) number lambda. But other than that, the eigenvector is really unique, that is, if
[tex]\hat A \left| a' \rangle = a \left| a' \rangle[/tex]
then |a'> cannot be anything different than a multiple of |a>.

This is what is meant by "unique up to a constant factor", which is enough since in QM, the pre-factor doesn't carry any physical meaning anyway (we normally just use it for convenience, e.g. to normalize eigenkets).
 
Last edited:
There is a complex (global-)phase: exp(i*phi), cos' we deal with complex numbers. And as convention we often we often taken phi = 0, so exp(i phi) = 1.

Is that what you looked for? You can see an example of this in Sakurai "modern QM" chapter 1 in discussion of Sx and Sy and their eigen-vectors.
 
Thank you CompuChip,

I understand now. Really appreciate that.
 
quote: >>the pre-factor doesn't carry any physical meaning anyway (we normally just use it for convenience, e.g. to normalize eigenkets).<<

Actually this phase freedom of vectors is of crucial importance when it comes to describing symmetries in QM.