Unit Vector Magnitudes and Forces

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on solving a statics problem involving unit vector magnitudes and forces in a system of cables. The position vectors for points A, B, C, and D are provided, along with their corresponding unit vectors. The main objective is to balance the forces acting on the system, represented by the equation ForceTotal = ForceAB + ForceAC + ForceAD, where the forces are expressed in terms of their unit vectors. The conversation emphasizes the importance of using algebraic symbols rather than numerical values for clarity in calculations.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of vector mathematics, specifically position and unit vectors.
  • Knowledge of statics and force balance equations.
  • Familiarity with cross product calculations in three-dimensional space.
  • Basic algebraic manipulation skills for resolving forces into components.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the principles of static equilibrium and force balance in mechanical systems.
  • Learn about vector resolution techniques and their applications in physics.
  • Explore the use of unit vectors in force calculations and their significance in engineering.
  • Review cross product operations and their relevance in determining torque and rotational effects.
USEFUL FOR

Students in physics or engineering disciplines, particularly those studying statics and dynamics, as well as professionals involved in structural analysis and mechanical design.

nobodyuknow
Messages
62
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



http://prntscr.com/p7dxt

Here's a screenshot of the revision question.

Homework Equations


The Attempt at a Solution



Co-ordinates of each point
A, (0, 60, 0)
B, (40, 0, 0)
C, (-40, 0, 40)
D, (-60, 0, -60)

Position Vectors
rAB, 40i + -60j + 0k
rAC, -40i + -60j + 40k
rAD, -60i + -60j + -60k

Unit Vectors corresponding these position vectors
eAB, 0.5547i + -0.8321j + 0k
eAC, -0.4851i + -0.7276j + 0.4851k
eAD, -0.5774i + -0.5774j + -0.5774k

This is all I know, I'm not sure how to complete the other questions.

For question would I have to put the two position vectors and do a cross product?

Something like...

i j k
-0.4851 -0.7276 0.4851
-0.5774 -0.5774 -0.5774

[(-0.7276)(-0.5774) - (0.4851)(-0.5774)]i + [(-0.4851)(-0.5774) - (0.4851)(-0.5774)]j + [(-0.4851)(-0.5774) - (-0.7276)(-0.5774)]k

If not, I'm totally lost, and need help!
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
I see no reason to consider cross products here. It's a simple statics question.
What components of the forces in the cables are of interest? What equations can you write down which say they balance out?
 
So essentially, balance out the forces...

Basically something like...

ForceTotal = ForceAB + ForceAC + ForceAD

2kN(eAB) = ForceAB = 1.1094i - 1.6642j + 0k
 
Last edited:
nobodyuknow said:
So essentially, balance out the forces...

Basically something like...

ForceTotal = ForceAB + ForceAC + ForceAD

2kN(eAB) = ForceAB = 1.1094i - 1.6642j + 0k
Forces in the y direction are not interesting. Whatever they add up to in tensions will be balanced by compression in the tower.
Your resolution of the 2kN into i and j looks right, but I'd rather you stuck with the algebraic symbols, like 'cos(θ)', not plugging in actual numbers until the end. It makes it much easier to follow what you're doing and spot any errors.
Create unknowns for the other tensions, write out their resolutions into i, j, k and hence the balance of forces equation.
 
So do you mean like...
ForceTotal = (eABi |FAB| + eACi |FAC| + eADi |FAD|)i + (eABj |FAB| + eACj |FAC| + eADj |FAD|)j + (eABi |FAB| + eACk |FAC| + eADk |FAD|)k

Which then becomes something like...

eACi |FAC| + eADi |FAD|)i = eABi |FAB|
eACj |FAC| + eADj |FAD|)j = eABj |FAB|
eACk |FAC| + eADk |FAD|)k = eABk |FAB|
 
Yes, except that as I mentioned you cannot write a useful equation for the vertical forces. That would involve the compression in the tower, which you don't care about.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K