Unit Vectors for Polarization and Wave Vector Directions

Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on understanding how to derive the expressions for the unit vectors of polarization (##\hat{n}##) and the wave vector (##\hat{k}##) in a specific problem involving wave equations. The user is particularly confused about the methods used to obtain the unit vector perpendicular to the plane defined by the equation ##x+y+z=0## and the vector parallel to the y-z plane. They seek clarification on the mathematical techniques, as their Linear Algebra textbook does not provide sufficient explanations. The user notes that the wave vector should be perpendicular to the specified plane, suggesting a relationship between the wave vector and the planes of constant phase. The discussion invites further insights from others to clarify these concepts.
roam
Messages
1,265
Reaction score
12

Homework Statement


I am having difficulty understanding the very first step of the following solved problem (I understand the rest of the solution).

How did they obtain the expressions for ##\hat{n}## (the direction of polarization), and ##\hat{k}## (the unit vector pointing in the direction of the wave vector)? :confused:

problem1.jpg

Homework Equations



##k=\frac{\omega}{\lambda f} = \frac{\omega}{c}=\frac{2 \pi}{\lambda}##

##E(r, t) = E_0 \ cos (k.r - \omega t) \hat{n}##

##B(r,t) = \frac{1}{c} E_0 \ cos (k.r - \omega t) (\hat{k} \times \hat{n})##

The Attempt at a Solution



What technique did they use to find the expression ##\frac{1}{\sqrt{6}} (\hat{x}+2\hat{y}+\hat{z})## for the unit vector perpendicular to ##x+y+z=0## plane?

Likewise, how did they get the expression ##\frac{1}{\sqrt{5}} (\hat{y}-2 \hat{z})## for the unit vector parallel to the y-z plane?

I could not find any explanations in my Linear Algebra textbook. So any explanation would be greatly appreciated.
 

Attachments

  • problem1.jpg
    problem1.jpg
    44.5 KB · Views: 400
Physics news on Phys.org
Where do you get that solution from?
 
blue_leaf77 said:
Where do you get that solution from?

This was the solution provided by my teacher. I don't understand, where did he get he get the expressions for ##\hat{n}## and ##\hat{k}## from?
 
Well that looks strange to me. If the wavevector should be perpendicular to ##x+y+z=0## plane then this plane must be parallel to the planes of constant phase ##\mathbf{k} \cdot \mathbf{r}=C## with ##C## a constant, in fact this plane is one of them. Which means any plane with equation ##x+y+z=C## is traversed by the beam perpendicularly, and we see the possible unit vector of ##k## that that can form such equation by the dot product with ##\mathbf{r}## must subtend the same angle with all three axes.
But I would like to hear the other's opinion.
 
The book claims the answer is that all the magnitudes are the same because "the gravitational force on the penguin is the same". I'm having trouble understanding this. I thought the buoyant force was equal to the weight of the fluid displaced. Weight depends on mass which depends on density. Therefore, due to the differing densities the buoyant force will be different in each case? Is this incorrect?

Similar threads

Replies
26
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
8
Views
1K
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
764
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
777
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
3K