Undergrad Is -1 in U=eiA an Exponent or an Inverse?

  • Thread starter Thread starter dyn
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Operator
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the interpretation of -1 in the expression U = eiA, where A is a Hermitian operator. The participants clarify that in the context of U+, the -1 serves as an exponent, while in U-1, it denotes the inverse of the matrix. The relationship e^{-iA} = (e^{iA})^{-1} is established as a fundamental property of exponentials of operators, specifically Hermitian operators. Participants emphasize the importance of understanding the definitions and properties of these mathematical constructs to justify the usage of -1 in both contexts.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Hermitian operators in quantum mechanics
  • Familiarity with unitary operators and their properties
  • Knowledge of the exponential function for operators, particularly e^A
  • Basic concepts of matrix inverses and multiplicative inverses
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of Hermitian operators in quantum mechanics
  • Learn about the derivation of the exponential of an operator, e^A
  • Research proofs of the relationship e^Ae^B = e^{A+B} for commuting operators
  • Explore the implications of unitary operators in quantum mechanics and their applications
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, physicists, and students studying quantum mechanics, particularly those interested in operator theory and the properties of Hermitian and unitary operators.

dyn
Messages
774
Reaction score
63
Hi
If A is a Hermitian operator then U = eiA is a unitary operator.
To prove this we take the Hermitian conjugate of U

U+ =
e-iA = (eiA)-1 (1)
U+ = U-1 (2)

My question is - In line (1) , -1 is used as an exponent or power while in line (2) , -1 is used to refer to the inverse of a matrix. Are these not 2 different uses of -1 ?
Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
dyn said:
My question is - In line (1) , -1 is used as an exponent or power while in line (2) , -1 is used to refer to the inverse of a matrix. Are these not 2 different uses of -1 ?
In general, ##X^{-1}## denotes the multiplicative inverse of ##X##, where ##X## is some mathematical object. In this case, you have to justify the index rule ##e^{-iA} = (e^{iA})^{-1}## for a (Hermitian) operator ##A##.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes topsquark
PeroK said:
In general, ##X^{-1}## denotes the multiplicative inverse of ##X##, where ##X## is some mathematical object. In this case, you have to justify the index rule ##e^{-iA} = (e^{iA})^{-1}## for a (Hermitian) operator ##A##.
Thanks. So the -1 in the equation you wrote is not an exponent ; it is the inverse of eiA ? How do i justify that ?
 
dyn said:
Thanks. So the -1 in the equation you wrote is not an exponent ; it is the inverse of eiA ? How do i justify that ?
You prove it, using the definition of ##e^A##.
 
I know the definition of eA as an infinite power series but i don't know how to get the inverse of that
 
dyn said:
I know the definition of eA as an infinite power series but i don't know how to get the inverse of that
More generally, if operators/matrices ##A## and ##B## commute, then you can show that:$$e^Ae^B = e^{A+B}$$It shouldn't be hard to find a proof online if you don't want to work it out for yourself.
 
  • Like
Likes topsquark
It's not that i don't work it out myself ; i don't know how to !
 
  • Haha
Likes topsquark and PeroK
I found it online. Thanks
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
887
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K