United States Physics 1 With Calculus

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves a block sliding down a frictionless ramp connected to a spring, with the goal of determining the extension of the spring when the block comes to a stop. The scenario includes parameters such as the spring constant, mass of the block, and the angle of the ramp.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the conservation of energy principle, relating kinetic and potential energy to the spring's potential energy. There are attempts to set up a quadratic equation to solve for the spring extension, with some participants questioning their calculations and the accuracy of their methods.

Discussion Status

Participants are actively engaging with each other's calculations, checking for errors, and providing feedback on the reasoning used in their approaches. There is a focus on ensuring the correctness of the mathematical setup and the interpretation of the problem.

Contextual Notes

There is mention of significant figures and the potential impact of rounding on the final answer, as well as the use of different methods for solving the quadratic equation, indicating variability in participants' approaches.

GreenPrint
Messages
1,186
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



See attachment.

In the system shown below, the spring is initially at its equilibrium length, L, and the block has a velocity down the ramp of 5 m/s. At the point where the block stops and turns around, the spring has a length of L + ΔL. Calculate ΔL. The ramp is frictionless, the spring constant is k = 4 N/m, the block's mass is 2 kg, and θ = 10 degrees.

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



See attachment.

I got about 3.492 meters. This problem sort of made me think more than I expected and I just wanted to make sure that my work looked reasonable and if my answer is correct possibly.
 

Attachments

  • Capture.PNG
    Capture.PNG
    10.5 KB · Views: 468
  • Scan2.jpg
    Scan2.jpg
    30.6 KB · Views: 395
Physics news on Phys.org
I have exactly the same as you for the first two lines.
I substituted numeric values at that point and got
2x² - 3.4x - 25 = 0 (using x in place of the delta L)
and x = 4.49.
Likely I made a mistake somewhere but it might be worth your checking your work by running it through this way.
 
Your opening argument says the initial kinetic energy and the change in gravitational potential energy gets stored in the spring. (It helps get full marks if you say so on the paper you hand in.)

I like that you took it one stage at a time, you simplified the general equation before substituting the numbers, and you did a dimensional analysis to make sure you got the right units out the end. Thus you have every reason to feel confident about your method.

Some pointers:
It helps to write notes about your reasoning on your paper - you have room to do that to the right of your equations.

First line you want to write "conservation of energy" or "KE and gravity gets stored in the spring"... something that shows the method.
Second line: "in standard form"
Third line: "quadratic equation".

Across the bottom - write out the answer using the words from the question:
"At the point where the block stops and turns around, the length of the spring has increased by 3.49m."

I don't know if you are expected to keep track of the significant figures and decimal places through the calculation. The mass of the block is only given to 1sig.fig.

Caveat: I did not actually crunch the numbers.
 
Hm interesting. I think my number crunching was correct. I just wanted to make sure my process was correct and like you said I have no reasonable doubt to do so but I just wanted to make sure. Thanks for looking at my work.
 
I should work through your calc line by line to try to find the discrepancy, but your solution is SO long! Far better for you to work through my two liner and find the mistake there (if it is there). Run that quadratic through your calculator.
 
grr hold up my calculator is bad
 
I hate fancy calculators! I have my quadratic solution in a spreadsheet. Just drop a, b, and c into it and the answers pop up. I don't think there is an error in that part of my calc.
 
I think it's suppose to be

-2x² + 3.4x + 25?
 
I found my mistake it's suppose to be the square root of 211.584 not 111.584
 

Similar threads

Replies
17
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
10K
Replies
16
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
4K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
4K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K