Units of Fourier Transform (CTFT) vs spectral density

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion clarifies the units associated with the Continuous Time Fourier Transform (CTFT) and spectral density. It establishes that the units of spectral density are defined as ##\frac{V^2}{Hz}##, contrasting this with the initial confusion regarding the units derived from the Fourier Transform, which initially suggested ##\frac{V^2}{Hz^2}##. The resolution involves recognizing the distinction between energy spectral density and power spectral density, emphasizing that energy density is expressed as energy per Hz.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Continuous Time Fourier Transform (CTFT)
  • Familiarity with Parseval's equation
  • Knowledge of spectral density concepts
  • Basic principles of signal integration
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of Parseval's theorem in the context of Fourier analysis
  • Learn about the differences between energy spectral density and power spectral density
  • Explore the implications of unit conversions in Fourier Transform applications
  • Investigate practical applications of spectral density in signal processing
USEFUL FOR

Electrical engineers, signal processing specialists, and students studying Fourier analysis will benefit from this discussion, particularly those focused on understanding spectral density and its applications in analyzing signals.

amama
Messages
7
Reaction score
1
I'm confused on how units work with regards to the Fourier Transform (CTFT).

I was reading the Wikipedia article on spectral density. In an example, they use Parseval's equation, along with the units calculated on the time side, to determine the units on the frequency domain side. The units of the spectral density are determined as ##\frac{V^2}{Hz}##.

The reasoning in the article makes sense, but what I am struggling with is how those units make sense from the definition of the Fourier Transform. The Fourier Transform integrates the signal with respect to time ##\int_{-\infty}^{\infty} x(t) e^{-j\omega t} dt##. I would guess that the units would be volt-seconds, which would be equivalent to ##\frac{V}{Hz}##. If you square that, like you do in the Parseval's equation, wouldn't the units now be ##\frac{V^2}{Hz^2}##, which is different than ##\frac{V^2}{Hz}##, so obviously I made a mistake somewhere.
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
Hello amama, :welcome: !
amama said:
If you square that
You do, but then you integrate over ##df## which has the dimension ##{\rm s}^{-1}## .
 
BvU said:
Hello amama, :welcome: !
You do, but then you integrate over ##df## which has the dimension ##{\rm s}^{-1}## .

Thanks. Based on your answer I looked back at what I was doing and realized that I was looking at energy spectral density and that I was used to looking at power spectral density.

With energy density the equation inside should be energy per Hz, which is what you get if you "flip" one of the s to the bottom as Hz, but leave the other one to turn the ##v^2## to ##v^2 s##, which is indeed units of energy.

$$v^2 s^2 = \frac{v^2 s}{Hz}$$
 

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K