University Physics 1 Work Problem

Click For Summary
The discussion centers around calculating the work done by a force on a car using the formula W = F · s, where F is the force vector and s is the displacement vector. The original calculations involved confusion over the angle between the force and displacement, leading to incorrect work estimates. After clarifying the angle, the correct work done was found to be approximately 169 J using the dot product method. Participants emphasized that using angles can simplify calculations, while the dot product is more efficient when working with coordinates. The conversation highlights the importance of understanding vector relationships in physics problems.
USN2ENG
Messages
107
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



You apply a constant force F=(-68.0N)i + (36.0N)j to a 390kg car as the car travels 60.0m in a direction that is 240.0° counterclockwise from the x-axis.

How much work does the force you apply do on the car?

Homework Equations



W=Fs
W=K2-K1
W=Fcos(θ)s
F/m=a
Vf^2=Vi^2 + 2Ad


The Attempt at a Solution



Im not sure what I am doing wrong here. I have calculated the magnitude of the Force as 76.9N.

So I have tried:
76.9(cos(240))*-60 (applying the force in the same direction as the car moves) = 2307J

I also tried to use the Work energy theorem and found acceleration (76.9/390kg)=0.197m/s^2. I then used this in Vf^2=Vi^2 + 2Ad. So Vf = 4.86. I then use that in K2-K2=W=.5mVf^2-.5Vi^2. (I was assuming that Vi is 0 here, even though it didn't state from rest)

I feel like this is something simple that I am missing. Any direction would be great!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
What's the angle between the force and the displacement?
 
Last edited:
Ahhhh ok. Thanks!

I was using the angle of s and not the angle between s and F.

So the angle of F is 152.1°
240°-152.1°=87.9

so W=(76.94N)cos(87.9)(60m) = 169N
 
Much better!
 
Well that's the other way to do it <sniff>.

The dot product would have been:

(-30)(-69)+(-30√3)(36)=169.39J

<sulks>
 
Haha, thanks for explaining that Simon! I guess I should have just looked at the W = F dot s to begin with and it would have made all of that a lot quicker. I am glad I have a new way of looking at that now.
Thanks Again
 
<perks up>
It's the way forward with computers - wait till you start working with matlab, octave, and the like. After a while it is the first thing you think of.

Basically, if you are given the angles - it's quicker to use the angles. If you are given coordinates, then the dot-product is faster and you don't have to worry about the deg/rad setting. In this case the angle of the displacement was simple, I didn't even need a calculator.
 

Similar threads

Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K